Causation 5.0 / 5 based on 1 rating ? LawCriminal LawUniversityNone Created by: Dan EdwardsCreated on: 09-01-14 15:10 8106352719 Across 1. R v Roberts [1971] 56 Cr App R 95 - If the victim responds in a way that a reasonable person could not have predicted, the resulting consequences will not be regarded as reasonably _________ and will be regarded as an independent intervening act. (11) 5. R v _______ (1847) Cox 273 made it clear that the result must be caused by a culpable act (8) 6. R v ______ [1996] Crim LR 35 - act or omission must be "something more than a slight or trifling link" (6) 9. Thin skull principle also includes mental conditions and beliefs as of R v _____ (1975) 1 WLR 1416 (5) 10. R v ______ (1983) 76 Cr App R - D's conduct must contribute significantly to the result. It need not be the sole cause or even the main cause (6) Down 1. Causation can only be established if both _____ and legal causation are established (7) 2. R v ____ (1910) 2 KB 124 created the but for test (5) 3. Latin terminology for the but for test (4, 3, 3) 7. Also, the Thin Skull Principle includes neglect or ill treatment by victims of themselves, defined in R v Holland (1841) and R v ____ (1996) (4) 8. The thin skull principle includes physical weakness as defined in R v ______ (1908) 21 Cox CC 692 (7)
Comments
No comments have yet been made