It confirms that voluntary intoxication, such as alcohol (where they knew the substance they were taking), the defence will fail, regardless of whether they knew the strength of the substance
1 of 7
What is the name of the case that confirms that dutch courage is part of voluntary intoxication?
Gallagher
2 of 7
What does the case of Sheehan Moore confirm?
It confirms that a specific intent crime will only accept voluntary intoxication if intent was not formed, as drunken intent is still intent
3 of 7
What is the case that confirms that voluntary intoxication will be rejected as a defence if a basic intent crime has been committed (recklessness in MR)?
Majewski
4 of 7
What is the name of the case that shows that d took a substance but didn't know it could cause reckless behaviour, such as valium?
Hardie
5 of 7
What happens in the case of Hardie?
D set fire to his friend's flat after taking a prescription drug not prescribed to him & he didn't know the risks of the drug
6 of 7
What is the name of the case which shows that involuntary intoxication will only succeed if intent was not formed?
Kingston
7 of 7
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
What is the name of the case that confirms that dutch courage is part of voluntary intoxication?
Back
Gallagher
Card 3
Front
What does the case of Sheehan Moore confirm?
Back
Card 4
Front
What is the case that confirms that voluntary intoxication will be rejected as a defence if a basic intent crime has been committed (recklessness in MR)?
Back
Card 5
Front
What is the name of the case that shows that d took a substance but didn't know it could cause reckless behaviour, such as valium?
Comments
No comments have yet been made