AO1, AO2, IDA, balanced argument, don't create a case study story link a case study to a point
1 of 12
Intro
theres a clear interaction between biological and social factors.
2 of 12
Intro
money and ehrhardt say labelling of sex directly effects the way a child is treated due to gender stereotypes
3 of 12
AO1
money and ehrhardt say labelling of sex between 0-2 will directly effect gender identity
4 of 12
AO2
there is clear evidence that a change in perception will lead to a change in behaviour. Smith and Lloyds study - dressed a baby in gender specific clothes and watched how it was treated spending on if the pp thought it was a boy or a girl
5 of 12
AO2
there is evidence to suggest that nurture is more important than nature. bradley found a boy with no penis and was reassigned as a girl. She stayed a girl and was happy with it and acted like a girl in early childhood
6 of 12
AO2
on the other hand some studies have also found nature to be more important than nurture.Reiner and Gearhart studies 16 bio males who had been reassigned as girls. by 16 10/16 had been changed back to boys showing it is rare for nurture to beat nature
7 of 12
AO2
further evidence of nature being more important is when luxe studied children and animals under 2 and found a strong preference in sex appropriate toys
8 of 12
AO2
money and ehrhardt took research from abnormal people so it is hard to generalise their results
9 of 12
AO2
there is a large concern about ethics. The case of david reimer will support this
10 of 12
IDA
Nature vs nurture - nature seems to be more predominant
11 of 12
IDA
real world application as the biological approach alone doesn't take into account any social factors
12 of 12
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
Intro
Back
theres a clear interaction between biological and social factors.
Comments
No comments have yet been made