Behaviour- LI and Sx

?
  • Created by: freya_bc
  • Created on: 16-02-18 12:32
Frith, 1979)
The basic cognitive defect… is an awareness of automatic processes which are normally carried out below the level of consciousness
1 of 20
Maher, 1983
Schizophrenics show a “failure of attentional focusing to respond to stimulus redundancy”
2 of 20
Hemsley, 1987
Schizophrenics are less able to make use of the redundancy and patterning of sensory input
3 of 20
Cutting, 1985)
Schizophrenics “concentrate on detail at the expense of theme
4 of 20
Griffith et al., (1972)
7pp no prior psycho given 10mg dextroamph every hour for 5 days all psychotic within 2-5days delusions
5 of 20
Goldman-Rakic, 2004
D1 agonists to boost DA hypo-function in frontal cortex?
6 of 20
Lubow’s
first method for testing LI in human pp- US = counter increment Task to work out which of a series of nonsense syllables (e.g., pev, jic) predicts the counter increment CS in fact a white noise-
7 of 20
Baruch et al., 1988)
Link between the loss of LI and SZ shown using the counter increment variant
8 of 20
Gray et al., 1996
Amphetamine treatment abolishes LI in ‘normal’ human participants (single 5 mg dose
9 of 20
Williams et al., 1997, 1998)
Haloperidol can reduce LI in humans - can actually make it worse
10 of 20
Kumari et al., 1999
Haloperidol effects in healthy humans depend on Psychoticism scores – human variation in the normal range- characteristics in that direction (single 5 mg dose
11 of 20
...
Pre exposed learn better Haloperidol only beneficial in high psychoticism groups (right side of graph)
12 of 20
Shrira and Kaplan, (2009)
Li reduced with sx- with vs without masking reduced effect in high sx group not seen under all conditioned- low Sx and high Sx with masking sig dif
13 of 20
Bleuler, 1911; Hemsley, 1987, 1993; Gray et al., 1991; Kapur, 2004)
Loss of the “selectivity which normal attention ordinarily exercises among the sensory impressions
14 of 20
Weiner et al., (1997)
Give amphet, more sensitive to shock, Latent inhib normal with haloperidol and amphet Enahnced inhib with halo on its own
15 of 20
Cassaday and Moran, (2010)
Li is reliably reduced by excitotoxic lesions to shell region of NAc, also influence of frontal
16 of 20
Maher, 1983)
Schizophrenics show a “failure of attentional focusing to respond to stimulus redundancy
17 of 20
Hemsley, 1987
Schizophrenics are less able to make use of the redundancy and patterning of sensory input” (
18 of 20
Nelson et al., (2011)
Da in DAx - salience modulation in LI and overshadowing ...
19 of 20
part 2...
Localised injections When infused amphet in these tubes LI- after stim pre exp amphet in core sub region, but shell affected Brain regions all work in shell Dissoc LI and overshadowing 2 ways of mani salience of cue for learning not equip for
20 of 20

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Maher, 1983

Back

Schizophrenics show a “failure of attentional focusing to respond to stimulus redundancy”

Card 3

Front

Hemsley, 1987

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

Cutting, 1985)

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Griffith et al., (1972)

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Li and Sx resources »