Attention

?
Humphreys et al., (1994)
METHOD: Patients presented with one word, line-drawing, or both. Asked whether they saw word. FINDING: The patients failed to report the word when presented together with a shape.
1 of 7
Humphreys et al., (1994b)
METHOD: Directly compared open vs. closed shapes. Asked participants whether they saw square. FINDINGS: Patients can identify the square in the "double" condition only when it is the better shape.
2 of 7
Shalev & Humphreys., (2002)
METHOD: Show patients piece of paper and ask them whether circle is at the top or bottom. Also presented face like displays. FINDING: Performance impaired when patient had to integrate parts within a whole. Performance improved when using faces.
3 of 7
Mevorach, Shalev & Humphreys
GK impaired at responding to global letters. However did show some interference from global suggesting this level was implicitly processed. Large primes facilitated detection of global level. However, was also temporary and decreased as F of time
4 of 7
Shalev et al., (2007)
Following Hebrew training the local capture returns.
5 of 7
Mevorach et al., (2014)
Left parietal patients show inability to suppress salient distractors
6 of 7
Mevorach et al., (2006b)
Left parietal stimulation leads to inability to suppress saliency. Right parietal stimulation leads to inability to select saliency. Suppression of the salient information appears to be preparatory.
7 of 7

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

METHOD: Directly compared open vs. closed shapes. Asked participants whether they saw square. FINDINGS: Patients can identify the square in the "double" condition only when it is the better shape.

Back

Humphreys et al., (1994b)

Card 3

Front

METHOD: Show patients piece of paper and ask them whether circle is at the top or bottom. Also presented face like displays. FINDING: Performance impaired when patient had to integrate parts within a whole. Performance improved when using faces.

Back

Preview of the back of card 3

Card 4

Front

GK impaired at responding to global letters. However did show some interference from global suggesting this level was implicitly processed. Large primes facilitated detection of global level. However, was also temporary and decreased as F of time

Back

Preview of the back of card 4

Card 5

Front

Following Hebrew training the local capture returns.

Back

Preview of the back of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Simultagnosia resources »