Its important that there is a legislature, this does not apply to Federal President of Austria
2 of 10
X v Netherlands
Royal society for cultivation of slower bulbs not a legistatures
3 of 10
The party must be 'inherent primary rulemaking power'
Booth-Clibborn v UK
4 of 10
Can the European Parliament be considered as a legislature feauture
Matthews v UK - EU regultion prevented the app to vote in, yes the parliament could be held accountable.
5 of 10
Communist party which gave the app a right to vote. When the party dissolved lost this, is this
Zdanoka v Lativa
6 of 10
Tanase v Moldova
Applicant has dual natationality told they didnt have to right to vote. Consenus in other countries, but this case it was not justified as it a large ortion of dual citizens.
7 of 10
Hirst v UK (No2)
The app argued right to vote. Violation found although gov argued it was posistive for detterence.
8 of 10
Pilot case, facts identical to Hirst.
Greens and M.T. looked at how similar cases should be treated. Court gave 6 months to change the law.
9 of 10
Scoppola No3
Forfeiture from voting, however not a blanket ban thus not a violation. Not all prisoners lost their rights.
10 of 10
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
C-C v Austria
Back
Its important that there is a legislature, this does not apply to Federal President of Austria
Card 3
Front
X v Netherlands
Back
Card 4
Front
The party must be 'inherent primary rulemaking power'
Back
Card 5
Front
Can the European Parliament be considered as a legislature feauture
Comments
No comments have yet been made