Arguments for and against the use of non-human animals in psychology

HideShow resource information
It is beneficial and ethically justifiable to use non-human animals in psychology why?
as this is the type of research is highly scientific
1 of 28
Animal research can be tightly what?
controlled in labs
2 of 28
how can it be carried out?
objectivley
3 of 28
It is higher on what? than research involving what?
reliability with a lower ethical cost
4 of 28
For example was did Singer suggest?
using animals in research is essential for the greater good of society, therefore is ethically acceptable
5 of 28
However what can opponents argue?
one accepted animal research was ethical, it is pointless anyway
6 of 28
why?
because what applies to animals does not necessarily apply to humans due to their different levels of intelligence
7 of 28
researchers using animals argue what?
legal constraints ensure that animal suffering is kept to a minimum
8 of 28
so they are what?
protected from harm
9 of 28
What two guidleines lay down strict constraints?
Animals act and BPS ethical guideline
10 of 28
Researchers using animals such as seyle would now what?
justify his use of so many rats, ensure suffering was kept to a minimum
11 of 28
What is the last thing researchers have to do?
explain wht it could not be carried out using non animal methods eg. scanning
12 of 28
What is this further backed up by?
home office who introduced the principle of the 3 Rs
13 of 28
What was this principle?
Replace, reduce and refine
14 of 28
What does this encourage?
support ethical considerations regarding animals in research
15 of 28
However even if these laws are observed, What still has to be considered?
the level of animal suffering involved in psychological research
16 of 28
What is the number of animals used today?
3000 per year in the UK
17 of 28
What did Dunayer argue?
Dunayer argues that the laws just make it legal to imprision, enslave and kill animals rather than making their use more ethical
18 of 28
Some psychologists believe humans are what?
more supierior to and more complex than animals
19 of 28
This means it is ethical to what?
Use animals due to potential aplications, which will ultimately improve the quality of human lives
20 of 28
For exampled, Pavlovs classical conditioning research in dogs, led to what?
cures for bed wetting and alcoholism
21 of 28
However, what is this?
speciesim
22 of 28
What could be argued?
animals should have the same rights as humans
23 of 28
but when researching on them, What are they denied?
Right to withdraw and consent
24 of 28
What is an absolutist position?
they would suggest that no use of animals is ever justifiable.
25 of 28
What does Bateson conclude?
when considering ethical issues and the use of the use of non- human pps
26 of 28
What was has to weigh up?
Quality og the research, certainty of benefit to humans and 3 the degree of animal suffering involved
27 of 28
What happens when 1 and 2 are high?
3 is low is it ethical and justifiable to carry out animal research
28 of 28

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Animal research can be tightly what?

Back

controlled in labs

Card 3

Front

how can it be carried out?

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

It is higher on what? than research involving what?

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

For example was did Singer suggest?

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all For and against animals in psychology resources »