1. Why was there no defence of intoxication in the case of AG for Northern Ireland v Gallagher?
- As the defendant brought the knife to kill his wife then got drunk and killed her
- As the defendant's crime was of basic intent
- As they had already developed the MR before intoxication
1 of 9
Other questions in this quiz
2. Which case outlines voluntary intoxication and basic intent?
- R v Dytham
- DPP v Smith
- DPP v Majewski 1976
- R v Lancaster
3. What does the defendant have to use, to use the defence of intoxication
- Just legal substances
- Just alcohol
- Drink, Drugs or other substances
- Just Illegal substances
4. What type of intent must the crime be, to use intoxication as a defence?
- Specific Intent
- Basic Intent
5. What case outlines Voluntary/ Specific intent?
- Sheeman & Moore (1975)
- R v Dica
- Lamb v Landcaster
- DPP v James
Similar Law resources: