1. What was the conviction in the case of Lipman 1970 and why?
- Manslaughter, as the defendant was reckless and this is not covered in Intoxicatio
- Manslaughter with the defence of intoxication, as the defendant took the LSD involuntarily
- Murder, as the defendant had already had the MR before becoming intoxicated
1 of 9
Other questions in this quiz
2. Why was there no defence of intoxication in the case of AG for Northern Ireland v Gallagher?
- As the defendant brought the knife to kill his wife then got drunk and killed her
- As the defendant's crime was of basic intent
- As they had already developed the MR before intoxication
3. Which case outlines voluntary intoxication and basic intent?
- R v Dytham
- DPP v Smith
- DPP v Majewski 1976
- R v Lancaster
4. What type of intent must the crime be, to use intoxication as a defence?
- Specific Intent
- Basic Intent
5. What does the defendant have to use, to use the defence of intoxication
- Just Illegal substances
- Just legal substances
- Drink, Drugs or other substances
- Just alcohol
Similar Law resources: