AQA A2 Law Unit 3 - Defences - Insanity
- Created by: Amy
- Created on: 25-02-14 16:57
Other questions in this quiz
2. Why did the insanity plea fall in the case of Windle?
- As he stated " ill hang for this" meaning he understood what he had done
- As he was not insane by Legal terminology
- As his insanity was only temporary
3. Disease of the mind must be the what terminology?, Which case outlines this?
- Legal - Bratty
- Legal - Sullivan
- Medical - Kemp
- Judges - Burgess
4. What is the nature and quality of a crime?
- Knew what he was doing, but didn't understand the circumstances or the consequences of his actions
- Didn't know what he was doing, Didn't understand the consequences and did not understand the circumstances in which he was acting
- Didn't know what he was doing, Understood the consequences but not the circumstances in which he acted in
5. When can the insanity plea not be used
- GBH S18, as its a specific intent crime
- Strict liability, as it requires a mens rea
- Strict liability, as it requires an Actus Reus
Similar Law resources:
Teacher recommended
Comments
No comments have yet been made