AQA A2 Law Unit 3 - Defences - Consent Part Two

HideShow resource information
  • Created by: Amy
  • Created on: 29-03-14 18:25

1. Was the consent given in Tabassum 2000 granted?

  • No, because the women thought he was a qualified medical professional
  • Yes, as the had given verbal consent
  • No, as he was not a fully qualified doctor
1 of 9

Other questions in this quiz

2. What happened in the case of Richardson 2000?

  • Dentist carried out work even though he was suspended - Not guilty as there was consent
  • Worked on patients even though he was suspended - guilty due to fraud

3. Was the defendant in the case of Slingsby convicted?

  • No - As she consented
  • No - as the victim consented and he was unaware
  • Yes - As he was aware of the damage caused

4. Under transmission of disease, what does the case of Dica 2004 show?

  • Biological GBH
  • Chemical ABH
  • Violent Sexual Intercourse without consent

5. In which two situations would genuine consent be questioned?

  • Hormonal Imbalances and Mentally challenged
  • Child and mentally challenged
  • Child and low IQ


No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal law resources »