Back to quiz

6. Which three are recognised exceptions?

  • Horseplay, above normal violence, medical dentistry
  • Sports, normal social intercourse, Horseplay
  • Sports, assisted suicide, normal sexual intercourse

7. In emergencies how does consent differ, and which case shows this?

  • The consent is assumed - Blaue
  • The person must be asked before anything can happen to them, even if unconscious Blaue
  • The consent is taken from family members - Richards

8. What does the case of Barnes 2004 outline?

  • As the tackle was late it was against the rules = guilty
  • Criminal proceedings should only be used if the conduct was grave
  • Must be more harmful than the reasonable man could withstand

9. Which case outlines consent to a non-fatal offence?

  • Bishop 1997
  • Brown 1993
  • R v Lamb 2008
  • R v Miller 1998