AQA A2 Law Unit 3 - Defences - Automatism

HideShow resource information
  • Created by: Amy
  • Created on: 25-02-14 17:37

1. Which case outlines Recklessness in Automatism?

  • James v Dorkings - Had not taken enough insulin and this had caused him to hit a lady - not an external factor
  • R v Hardy - Took some out of date valium and set alight a wardrobe - Lead to unpredictable behaviour
  • R v Kemp - Was given some drugs believing them to be paracetamol, caused her to hit her husband - Involuntary
1 of 8

Other questions in this quiz

2. Which of these are external causes?

  • Blow to head, bee sting, hypnosis
  • Injury or disease caused the mental illness
  • Drug or Alcohol induced
  • Disease of the mind

3. What happened in the case of R v T 1990?

  • Defendant took some out of date LSD and then proceeded to attack his wife
  • Defendant took part in a robbery and raised defence of automatism as she had PTSD from a previous ****
  • Defendant took part in a murder and raised the defence of automatism as she had been previously drinking

4. What did the case of Bratty outline?

  • Difference between automatism and intoxication
  • Distinction between insanity and Loss of control
  • Distinction between insanity and automatism
  • Difference of automatism and diminished responsibility

5. In which case did the defendant attack a patient after being hypoglycaemic from an overdose of insulin?

  • R v Hardy - Automatism
  • Kemp - Insanity
  • Quick - self induced
  • Quick - Automatism


No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal law resources »