1. Quick Recap: How do Sociologists typically define Crime?
- The attacking of social institutions - including the legal system.
- The violation of norms of society that have been enacted into law.
- The disapproval towards the criminal justice system.
- A bad thing
1 of 13
Other questions in this quiz
2. Which of these is NOT a criticism of the Functionalist perspective (all others are)?
- Safety Valves - e.g. Prostitution - can actually break down a family.
- Could create social cohesion "wrongly" - e.g. Nazi Germany vs the Jews
- Durkheim is too pessimistic with his perspective on society.
- Crime isn't functional for the individual(s) that was/were targeted.
- It can cause isolation, not solidarity.
- The perspective is teleological (doesn't explain causes).
- There are different views of what is 'criminal' depending on countries and individuals.
3. What can too much crime do?
- Destroy value consensus
- Nothing much
- Destabilise society
- Prove Functionalists wrong
4. Which of these is NOT a strength of the Functionalist perspective (all others are)?
- It manages to explain the causes of crime better than Strain Theory.
- The perspective is useful at showing the hidden/latent functions of crime.
- The benefits can be compared to real world examples e.g. James Bulger
5. Which of these is NOT typically used as an example of crime with a latent/hidden benefit (all others are)?
- Shannon Matthews murder.
- Excessive drinking at carnivals/festivals.
- White Collar Crime
- Martin Luther King assassination.