Other questions in this quiz

2. Which of these is NOT a strength of the Functionalist perspective (all others are)?

  • The benefits can be compared to real world examples e.g. James Bulger
  • It manages to explain the causes of crime better than Strain Theory.
  • The perspective is useful at showing the hidden/latent functions of crime.

3. Which of these statements would a Functionalist agree with?

  • Crime is a normal part of traditional societies, but not modern societies.
  • Crime is a normal, inevitable, and universal part of society.
  • Crime is always bad and leads to social collapse unless removed.
  • Crime is not a problem Functionalists should concern themselves with.

4. IMPORTANT: What is Anomie?

  • Annihilation of class and gender divides.
  • Disruption/A state of normlessness.
  • Weakening of a collective conscience.
  • Another way of saying "value consensus".

5. Who stated that crime could be used as a warning device?

  • (Kingsley) Davis
  • (Kai) Erikson
  • (Albert) Cohen
  • (Ned) Polsky

Comments

alainahmad

very useful thank you 

Similar Sociology resources:

See all Sociology resources »See all Crime and deviance resources »