Skip to content
1. Which of these is NOT a criticism of the Functionalist perspective (all others are)?
- Could create social cohesion "wrongly" - e.g. Nazi Germany vs the Jews
- The perspective is teleological (doesn't explain causes).
- There are different views of what is 'criminal' depending on countries and individuals.
- Durkheim is too pessimistic with his perspective on society.
- It can cause isolation, not solidarity.
- Safety Valves - e.g. Prostitution - can actually break down a family.
- Crime isn't functional for the individual(s) that was/were targeted.
1 of 12
Other questions in this quiz
2. What can too much crime do?
- Nothing much
- Prove Functionalists wrong
- Destabilise society
- Destroy value consensus
3. Who used the example of Prostitution as a safety valve?
- (Ned) Polsky
- (Kingsley) Davis
- (Emile) Durkheim
- (Albert) Cohen
4. Which of these is not listed as a function of crime by Functionalists (all others are)?
- Crime can act as a warning device.
- Crime can be a way for the youth to progress to adulthood.
- Crime promotes social cohesion.
- Crime can still provide members of society with careers.
- Crime can act as a safety valve.
- Crime can lead to adaptation and change.
- Crime informs us of social boundaries.
5. Who stated that society could potentially be organised to sustain, not remove, crime?
- (Kai) Erikson
- (Ned) Polsky
- (Kingsley) Davis
- (Albert) Cohen
Comments
Report