AQA Sociology A2 - Durkheim's et al. Functions Of Crime
HideShow resource information
- Created by: Inexorably
- Created on: 21-09-15 16:46
Other questions in this quiz
2. Who stated that crime could be used as a warning device?
- (Kai) Erikson
- (Ned) Polsky
- (Albert) Cohen
- (Kingsley) Davis
3. Which of these statements would a Functionalist agree with?
- Crime is a normal part of traditional societies, but not modern societies.
- Crime is not a problem Functionalists should concern themselves with.
- Crime is a normal, inevitable, and universal part of society.
- Crime is always bad and leads to social collapse unless removed.
4. Quick Recap: How do Sociologists typically define deviance?
- The recognised abolishing of societal values.
- The recognised violation of cultural norms.
- The recognised disruption of social solidarity.
- The recognised disapproval of institutions of power.
5. Which of these is NOT a criticism of the Functionalist perspective (all others are)?
- Crime isn't functional for the individual(s) that was/were targeted.
- Could create social cohesion "wrongly" - e.g. Nazi Germany vs the Jews
- Durkheim is too pessimistic with his perspective on society.
- Safety Valves - e.g. Prostitution - can actually break down a family.
- The perspective is teleological (doesn't explain causes).
- It can cause isolation, not solidarity.
- There are different views of what is 'criminal' depending on countries and individuals.
Comments
Report