Back to quiz

6. What are the A02 points for evoultionary explanations of relationships?

  • Akert, Walster et al, Buss et al, Student/experiementor
  • Buss et al, Waynforth + Dunbar, Student/experimentor,
  • Tashiro + Frazier, Akert, Murstein, Waynforth + Dunbar
  • Buss et al, Waynforth + Dunbar

7. What are the 2 theories used to explain formation of romantic relationships?

  • Social exchange theory and Reward-need satisfaction
  • Reward-need satisfaction and Matching hypothesis
  • Equity theory and Social exchange theory
  • Rollie and Ducks theory and Matching hypothesis

8. What is the explanation given for the breakdown of relationships

  • Rollie and Ducks stage model: 1) Intra-Psychic, 2) Dyadic, 3) Social, 4) Grave dressing, 5) Resurrection, as well as Rollie stating that multiple factors lead to breakdown ie. lack of stimulation
  • Rollie and Fricks model: 1) Dyadic, 2) Social, 3) Intra-psychic, 4) Grave dressing 5) Resurrection
  • Rollie and Duck's Model: 1)Social, 2) Intra-psychic, 3) Dyadic, 4) Grave dressing, 5) Resurrection
  • Rollie and Duck: 1) Intra-Psyhic, 2) Dyadic, 3) Social, 4) Grave dressing

9. What is meant by the matching hypothesis?

  • partner=source of reward and this reward is learned through classical (association) and operant (consequence) conditioning
  • Those who live in the same area will match better
  • Where someone seeks a partner with a similar desirabilty (if you have a high desirablity your partner will be of high desirability) and those best matched last longer
  • Where what you put into a relationships must equal what you get out of it

10. What are the 4 researchers that investigated the formation of relationships

  • Griffit+Guay, May and Hamiliton, Walster et al, Murstein
  • May and Hamilton, Murstein, Cate et al, Akert
  • Tashiro+Frazier, Akert, Walster et al, Murstein
  • Akert, Walster, Hofstede, Levine et al

11. What did May and Hamilton find?

  • Pictures of real couples were rated more similarily than pictures of randomly paired couples, supporting matching hypothesis
  • Ppts were asked to rate pictures of opposite sex. One group had positive music played and the other had negative music and then this compare with a control (no music)- found that those in positive group rated pictures higher, supporting theory
  • Liking rate of experimentor by ppts. was higher when they were positively reinforced (praised), supporting the reward-need satisfaction hypothesis
  • 752 students, rated by 4 judges on attractiveness and then randomly paired, it was found physical attractiveness was most important factor after ppts were asked to rate dates, challenging matching hypothesis

12. What did Murstein find?

  • Pictures of real couples were rated more similarily than pictures of randomly paired couples, supporting matching hypothesis
  • Ppts were asked to rate pictures of opposite sex. One group had positive music played and the other had negative music and then this compare with a control (no music)- found that those in positive group rated pictures higher, supporting theory
  • Liking rate of experimentor by ppts. was higher when they were positively reinforced (praised), supporting the reward-need satisfaction hypothesis
  • 752 students, rated by 4 judges on attractiveness and then randomly paired, it was found physical attractiveness was most important factor after ppts were asked to rate dates, challenging matching hypothesis

13. What did Griffit and Guay find?

  • 752 students, rated by 4 judges on attractiveness and then randomly paired, it was found physical attractiveness was most important factor after ppts were asked to rate dates, challenging matching hypothesis
  • Ppts were asked to rate pictures of opposite sex. One group had positive music played and the other had negative music and then this compare with a control (no music)- found that those in positive group rated pictures higher, supporting theory
  • Liking rate of experimentor by ppts. was higher when they were positively reinforced (praised), supporting the reward-need satisfaction hypothesis
  • Pictures of real couples were rated more similarily than pictures of randomly paired couples, supporting matching hypothesis

14. What did the Anderson research show?

  • 91 non-parent students asked certain questions to do with raising child but no differences found
  • Men invest just as much as their step children
  • Men have greater ANS arousal when asked questions about being a parent
  • Childhood experiences influence later in life sex differences

15. What did the Van der Kolk and Fisler research show?

  • Attachment type is not fixed, you can shift from SA to IA
  • Children who had suffered abuse, had a disorganised attachment type
  • Longitudinal study, 78 ppts followed from infancy to adolescence and those rated securely attached had closer relationships
  • Love quiz, IA= fear of closeness, IR= difficulty in finding true love, SA= solid relationships AND divorce rate 12% higher in IA

16. What are the A02 points for the parent-child relationships on romantic relationships essay

  • Hazan + Shaver, Simpson et al, Van der Kolk + Fisler, Kitzpatrick
  • Trivers et al, Hazan + Shaver, Simpson et al, Van der Kolk + Fisler
  • Simpson et al, Van der Kolk + Fisler, Kitzpatrick, Walster et al,
  • Hazan + Shaver, Simpson et al, Van der Kolk + Fisler, Walster et al

17. What did the Simpson et al study find?

  • 99 real couples compared to fake couples and those real couples were rated more similarily
  • Computer dance study, ppts chose those who were most similar to them
  • participants in a realtionship rated pictures of opposite sex lower than single ppts to eliminate alternatives
  • participants in a realtionship rated pictures of opposite sex higher than single ppts to eliminate alternatives

18. What are the A02 points for sex differences in parental investment?

  • Geher et al, Geher et al follow up, Anderson, Socialisation
  • Walster et al, Geher et al, Anderson
  • Socialisation, Geher et al, Walster et al, Anderson
  • Trivers et al, Geher et al, Walster et al

19. What are the 2 explanations of mantainence of romantic relationships

  • matching hypotheis annd Equity theory
  • Reward-need satisfaction and Equity theory
  • Social exchange and Equity theory
  • Social exhcange theory and matching hpothesis

20. What did Walster et al find?

  • Pictures of real couples were rated more similarily than pictures of randomly paired couples, supporting matching hypothesis
  • 752 students, rated by 4 judges on attractiveness and then randomly paired, it was found physical attractiveness was most important factor after ppts were asked to rate dates, challenging matching hypothesis
  • Liking rate of experimentor by ppts. was higher when they were positively reinforced (praised), supporting the reward-need satisfaction hypothesis
  • Ppts were asked to rate pictures of opposite sex. One group had positive music played and the other had negative music and then this compare with a control (no music)- found that those in positive group rated pictures higher, supporting theory