AQA law - Proving Negligence

HideShow resource information

1. In Bolton v Stone, the cricket club weren't in breach of duty because...?

  • There is a social benefit to playing cricket and the likelihood of the ball leaving the grounds and hitting someone was very low.
  • The cricket ball caused a serious injury to the person it hit but they didn't sue as they were a massive fan of the game.
  • There is a social benefit to playing cricket, and the ball hit a fellow cricket player who understood that playing the sport could lead to injury.
  • The likelihood of the cricket ball leaving the ground was high but the social benefit of the sport outweighs this.
1 of 10

Other questions in this quiz

2. If the defendant has BREACHED their duty of care, they have...?

  • caused harm that was unforeseeable
  • done something wrong and shown no remorse for their actions
  • done something wrong or failed to do something
  • caused a personal injury to the claimant

3. The first duty of care was established in...?

  • Pepper v Hart
  • Donaghue v Stevenson
  • Caparo v Dickman
  • Caparo v Hart

4. There are 3 tests for looking at whether there was a breach that caused resulting damage... what are they?

  • eggshell skull rule, chain of causation and the caparo test
  • remoteness of damage, caparo test and the neighbour principle
  • but-for test, eggshell skull rule and remoteness of damage
  • but-for test, eggshell skull rule and chain of causation

5. 'The defendant must take the claimant as he finds him' ... which rule / test does this definition best apply to?

  • the JAC test
  • but for test
  • eggshell skull rule
  • neighbour principle

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Law of Tort resources »