1. According to Singer, humans are morally required to take what into account?
- An animal's right not to be eaten
- An animal's welfare (pain/pleasure), in equal measure to that of a human.
- An animal's welfare (pain/pleasure), just below that of a human's welfare
- An animal's right to vote
1 of 13
Other questions in this quiz
2. Under what conditions would treating animals badly be morally wrong for Kant?
- If animals develop better communication skills so that they can explain their experience of pain.
- If the animals are the subject of a life
- If it compromises a person's ability to treat other humans well, and therefore threatens the person's own moral integrity.
- If the overall suffering of animals outweighs the pleasure this bad treatment creates for humans.
3. Peter Singer thought that the way animals are currently treated is...
- Not a moral issue
- Morally Unjustifiable
- Morrally Justifiable
- Against our duty towards animals
4. Rosalind Hursthouse (a modern virtue ethicist) believes that
- There is a natural hierarchy of living things, the function of those lower down (animals) is to serve the needs of those higher up (humans).
- No animal can be granted higher 'moral status' as there is no familiar set of factors that some animals share and others don't.
- We must calculate whether an animal's interests and preferences should be included in our utility calculus.
- The 'moral status' of other animals is an important subject to clarify so that we can determine whether it has rights
5. According to Aristotle, animals have no share in...
Similar Philosophy resources: