Discriminatory voter registration laws not unconstitutional – no specific mention of race in voting qualifications
Mississipi v Williams 1898
2 of 13
The company’s employment requirements did not pertain to the applicants’ ability to perform the job, and so were discriminating against black employees
Griggs v Duke Power Company 1971
3 of 13
Clarified the distinction between de jure and de facto segregation
Miliken v Bradley 1974
4 of 13
Declared racial segregation in transport illegal (interstate)
Boynton v Virginia 1960
5 of 13
A private school which practiced racial discrimination could not be eligible for a tax exemption
Coit v Green 1971
6 of 13
Invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage
Loving v Virginia 1967
7 of 13
Busing was an appropriate remedy for the problem of racial imbalance in schools
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education 1971
8 of 13
States that provided a school to white students had to provide in-state education to blacks as well
Gaines v Canada 1938
9 of 13
Outlawed the use of white primaries
Smith v Allwright 1944
10 of 13
State laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students declared unconstitutional
Brown v Board of Education 1954
11 of 13
Bus segregation declared unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment
Browder v Gayle 1956
12 of 13
A prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenge in a criminal case may not be used to exclude jurors based solely on their race
Batson v Kentucky 1986
13 of 13
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
Discriminatory voter registration laws not unconstitutional – no specific mention of race in voting qualifications
Back
Mississipi v Williams 1898
Card 3
Front
The company’s employment requirements did not pertain to the applicants’ ability to perform the job, and so were discriminating against black employees
Back
Card 4
Front
Clarified the distinction between de jure and de facto segregation
Back
Card 5
Front
Declared racial segregation in transport illegal (interstate)
Comments
No comments have yet been made