1. What does the case of Klinenberg v Marsden tell us?
- Possession and control has a very wide definition
- There must be a clear obligation
- Obligations can be formal
- Exact notes and coins do not need to be used
1 of 13
Other questions in this quiz
2. Which of these does not come under Actus Reus?
- Belonging to another
3. Which is correct?
- No statutory definition
- A person is guilty of theft if he appropriates property dishonestly from another with the intention to permanently deprive the other of it
- A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with an intention to permanently deprive the other of it
- A person is guilty if he appropriates property with intention or recklessness to deprive the other of it permanently
4. Which of these is correct? You're buying a cheeseburger in McDonald's and your friend Corinne tells you that the £1 you've paid may pay for other things other than the components of the cheeseburger.
- They must refund you and give you free cheeseburgers so you don't take them to court
- When you pay for a cheeseburger, the money may go to other things for the business, this is not theft as this would be unreasonable as in Hall
- The company commits theft because their obligations are clear
- McDonald's can do what they want and so can any other company regadless
5. What is the case law for assumption of rights to sell?
- Pitman v Hehl