Social Psychology - group productivity and decision making
- Created by: Shelly23
- Created on: 03-01-17 14:05
Fullscreen
Norman triplett's 1898
- school children worked in two conditions: alone vs in pairs
- http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Triplett/
Zajonc 1965 - drive theory of social facilitation
- the precence of others automatically produces arousal, which 'drives' dominant responses
- performance is improved by a 'correct' dominant response, but it is impaired but an 'incorrect' dominant response
- precence of others - arousal - increase in performing dominant responses - if correct - social facillition
- precence on others - arousal - increase in performing dominant responses - in incorrect - social inhibition
Markus 1978
- paricipants dressed in their own clothing (easy task) or in unfimiliar clothing (difficult task)
- they dressed either alone, with an incidental audience present or with an attentive audience present
- evaluation apprehension occured on the easy tak, only the attentive audience reduced the time taken to dress
- there was a drive effect on the difficult task, both incidental and attentive audiences increased the time taken to dress compared to alone
Ringelmann 1913
- force per person as a function of group size
- as the number of people pulling horizontally (tug of war) on a rope increased, each persons exertation was reduced: people pulling in eight persons groups each exert half the effort as of a person pulling alone
Latane, Williams and Harkins 1979 - social loafing
- shouting, cheering, clapping
- alone vs groups of 2, 4 and 6
- noise produced by person reduced by:
- 29% in two person groups
- 49% in four person groups
- 60% in six person groups
- people were matchng to standered
- induviduals shouted les loudly as group size increased
Brainstorming
- facilitates creative thinking
- groups generate more ideas (say what comes to mind, be non-critical)
- but individuals no more creatove in brainstorming groups than on their own (Stroebe and Diehl1994)
- factors that affect inferior performance in brainstorming groupps: evaluation apprehension; social loafing; production matching; production blocking (can be remedied by electroning brainstorming and…
Comments
No comments have yet been made