Nietzsche Beyond Good and Evil: Nature of morality
- Created by: Ann McHale
- Created on: 19-05-10 15:51
Fullscreen
Morality and human nature
- account of morality in non-moral psychological terms
- interprets moral values and history of their development in terms of the will to power
Attack on morality
- N doesnt reject everything about conventional morality
- misinterpreted as attacking all values (nihilism)
- claims our existing values weaken the will to power in humans - threat to human greatness
- moral ideal is a person who isnt great, a herd animal who seeks security and comfort and the avoidance of suffering
- N aims to free those who can be great from the mistake of living according to this morality
- isnt what is valuable what i great, an expression of strength and success?
- how do traits like meekness, self-denial and pity become values?
On morality
- N attacks any morality that supports values that harm the higher type of person and benefits the herd/ presupposes free will/ idea that we can know the truth about ourself through introspection/ similiarty of people
- attacks morality by its values, its origins, its claim that it should apply to all and by its empiral and metaphysical assumptions
Particularity of moral systems
- if there were universal moral values they'd be the same for everyone + history could only tell us how we came to discover them and why we didnt discover them sooner
- history of morality would be like history of science
- history of morality isnt like this - tells story of how values themselves changed
- N rejects argument that there are universal moral principles (founded on reason/happiness etc) as it assumes there is no natural history of morality
- claim to universality = specific feature of morality we've inherited
- assumes whats good for one person = good for everyone
- doesnt recognise there are different types of people
Free will and introspection
- each person has a fixed psycho-physical constitution - values + lives = expression of this
- constitution determines what they can do/become relative to their circumstances
- wills origin = in unconscious physiological forces - 'thought comes when "it" wants to not when "I" want it to'
- act of will has its origins in something else
- whatever we're conscious of in ourselves = effect of something we're not conscious of
- introspection cant lead to self-knowledge
- conventional morality requires we make moral judgements on basis of persons motives
- presupposes we can know which motives cause an action
- when we've clearly formed an intention its not just this that brings avout the action but any number of factors
- will is free = idea there are no causes of an act of will other than itself (causa sui)
- experience of willing doesnt have to lead to this idea - ask ourselves what purpose it serves e.g. to defend our belief in ourselves + our right to praise
- another purpose = holding people to blame for whats in their power
- free will = idea that values on their own could be basis for act of will
- will isnt conditioned by anything of this world
- N doesnt imply that the will is unfree in the…
Comments
No comments have yet been made