Environmental Approaches: The Criminology of Place and Time
- Created by: George Russell
- Created on: 17-12-13 21:26
Locating / Exploring Offenders
- Shaw and McKay (1931)
- Location of offenders in Chicago
- Concentric zones – a way of dividing the city
- Zone 2 – poor area where there was most offenders
- Zone of transition – another name for zone 2
- Social disorganisation – because of high turnover within the area there is no coherent norms and values which explained the high levels of offenders.
- Cultural transmission theory – In zone 2, there became an acceptance that crime and deviance was acceptable.
- Sutherland and Cressey (1966)
Introduced the concept of differential association – a theory that behaviour is learnt and justified by friends and family – If a person is exposed to crime and deviance, then people are more likely to commit crimes. There are 4 key factors that influence this:
- 1) Frequency – the number of times you are exposed to crime and deviance
- 2) Duration – the length you are exposed to crime and deviance
- 3) Priority – at what state in your life, if young then it is more likely to influential than older
- 4) Influence – The more influential the exposure the more it will take effect
This theory was a response to Shaw and McKay’s theory which was criticised for its vague nature.
- Morris (1957)
- Local councils place delinquent families together making areas ‘high crime areas’
- An example of this can be seen in Croydon, London
- There is no evidence that people in delinquent areas have a coherent set of values that are any different from others
- Baldwin and Bottoms (1976)
- Two estates separated by a duel carriageway
- One had a 300% higher rate of offenders and 350% higher level of crime than the other
- Researched ‘tipping’
- Tipping – local authorities were in charge of where people were put, law abiding citizens could move away whereas anti-social families were all put together.
- W.G.Skogan (1983)
- USA study ‘fleshed out’ tipping
- Found that social control breaks down with deterioration of an area
- Control also breaks down from public use of alcohol and drugs
- Situation of disorder:
- 1) Undermines informal social control
- 2) Generates worries about neighbourhood safety
- 3) Causes law abiding people to move away
Social disorganisation – lack of shared values resulting in an increase in the number of offenders
Putnam – suggests that areas that have tipped lack close family and friendship and bonds (social capital) in order to feel integrated within the community
Wilson – Suggests that in areas that have tipped…
Comments
No comments have yet been made