Dominance Interactions & Game Theory

?

Game Theory

  • Evaluation is via Game Theory
  • Developed by Maynard-Smith, based on economic theory
  • The solution to the 'game' is the evolutionary stable strategy 
    • A strategy which, when adopted by most members of the population, cannot be beaten by any other strategy in the game.

Analysis of Fighting Strategies

  • What is the most successful fighitng strategy?
  • Why are some fights ritualised displays and others physical contact?
  • Evolution should favour displays
  • Strategies can't be evaluated using a simple optimality model of costs and benefits as the optimal way for one individual to behave depends on what other competitors are doing.

Hawks and Doves

  • Imagine a contest over a resource (e.g. habitat) with 2 extreme strategies:
  • Hawk
    • Always fight to injure and kill your opponent - possible risk of injury to self
  • Dove
    • Display but never engage in a serious fight - i.e. run away when opponenet escaltes fight

Fight outcomes

  • Hawk vs Hawk
    • Each contestant has a 50% chance of injuring opponent and winning resource, and 50% chance of being injured.
  • Hawk vs Dove
    • Hawk always wins resource
  • Dove vs Hawk
    • Dove retreats immediately before injury
  • Dove vs Dove
    • Resource is shared

Payoff Matrix

How would evolution proceed?

  • If all individuals were Doves....
    • Everyone has an average payoff of 25
    • But a mutant Hawk has a payoff of 50 so would do very well
    • Dove is not an Evolutionary Stable Strategy as it can be invaded by Hawks

Comments

katherine2

Report

Je ne sais pas pourquoi j'ai fini par lire une théorie sur le jeu qui ne m'est pas très utile aussi utile que ce site Web L'imprimante 3D ici ce this site que vous pouvez lire sur le jeu de casino en ligne et en savoir plus sur le même que t'offrir beaucoup de bonnes choses