Criticisms of Defences
- Created by: carolinemather
- Created on: 13-06-17 10:52
Fullscreen
- Intro
- Insanity developed from M'Naghten
- Defect of reason from a disease of the mind that causes the D to not understand the nature and quality, not understand that what he did was illegal
- Law Commission Insanity and Automatism 2013
Definition of Insanity
- Legal definition not medical
- Words like defect of reason and disease of the mind have no relevance to doctors
- People can be deemed insane that we would not reasonably see as insane
- Diabetes - Hennessy
- Hardened arteries - Kemp
- Butler Committee suggested not guilty by reason of medical disorder
Burden and Standard
- There is a reversal from the normal BAS
- Goes against article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights
- D is innocent until proven guilty
- Butler Committee - jury should not have to decide insanity
Legally insane without mental illness
- Diabetics - Hennessy
- Hardened Arteries - Kemp
- Sleepwalkers - Thomas
- suggests these people are a danger to the public
- Most can control their illness with medication
- Law may not need to intervene
Nature and Quality
- Sutcliffe
- Windle
- Byrne
- Those who the defence is aimed at are unable to use it
Position of Diabetics
- Sullivan - insanity
- Quick - Automatism
- Quick got a complete defence whereas Hennessy got a hospital order for insanity
Social Stigma
- Bad enough labelling mental disorders as insane
- Inappropriate to name diabetics etc this way
- Only 30 pleas a year
- Large…
Comments
No comments have yet been made