conformity 12 markers (1-4)
- Created by: dragonwolf
- Created on: 06-12-15 11:37
Fullscreen
outline and evaluate explanations of conformity
AO1
conformity can be shown through two explanations;
normative social influence:
- individuals conform with the expectations of the majority
- gain approval or avoid social disapproval
- usually compliance; only conform publicly and not privately
informational social influence:
- individuals conform as a result of a desire to be right
- they look to others to gain information or evidence about reality
- more likely when the situation is ambiguous
- an example of internalisation as they believe the others are correct
AO3
normative social influence
P:
- a strength of normative social influence is the fact that there is evidence supporting this explanation
E:
- Asch (1956)
C1:
- this shows that
C2:
- this means that
informational social influence
P:
- a strength of informational social influence is the fact that there is evidence supporting this explanation
E:
- Sherif
C1:
- this shows that
C2:
- this means that
outline and evaluate variations of Asch
AO1
Asch (1956):
- 123 male US undergraduates (volunteers)
- all participants were confederates except one
- asked to identify matching line lengths
- conformity was measured on 12 critical trials where all confederates gave the same wrong answer
- average conformity rate was 33%
- less than 1% of participants gave a wrong answer in control situation with no confederates
- majority of participants conformed to avoid disapproval, but did not believe it was the correct answer
variables affecting conformity
group size:
- very little conformity when majority consisted of just one or two confederates
- conformity rose to 30% with a majority of three confederates
- further increases did not increase conformity significantly
unanimity of the majority:
- conformity dropped to 5.5% when participant had support for the correct answer
- conformity dropped to 9% when unanimity was broken with a different incorrect answer
difficulty of the task:
- conformity increased when the correct answer was made less obvious
- Lucas et al. (2006) found that the influence of task difficulty is moderated by the self-efficacy of the individual
AO3 strength
P:
- a strength of Asch's study is that the methodology used a non-ambiguous situation to prove conformity
E:
- the critical trials had right or wrong answers
- confederates would either answer with the right answer or a wrong answer
- participants would either get the answer right or conform and get the answer wrong
- conformity could be proven as less than 1% of answers given in control situations were wrong
C1:
- this shows that Asch's study was internally valid
- it suggests that conformity was the only reason for wrong answers given by participants
C2:
- this means that Asch's study can be used to prove the validity of conformity through normative social influence
AO3 weakness
P:
- it could be argued that Asch's research is oversimplified as it did not take into account cultural differences in conformity
E:
- Smith and Bond (2006) meta-analysis
- 133 Asch type studies across 17 countries
- average conformity rate for individualist cultures- 25%
- average conformity rate for collectivist cultures- 37%
- Markus and Kitayama (1991) higher level of conformity is viewed more favourably in collectivist cultures
C1:
- this reduces…
Comments
No comments have yet been made