B) Religious language as cognitive, but meaningless
- Created by: Gradebaker
- Created on: 24-04-19 14:28
Fullscreen
Logical Positivism
- Developed from the work of the Vienna Circle (1920s)
- Fundamental principle: only those propositions which can be verified (as true/false) empirically have meaning
- "The meaning of a proposition is the method of verification" -Mortiz Schlick
- Anything outside of basic logical/ scientific tenets is dismissed as meaningless, as it is unverifiable
- Leaves tautological (self-explanatory) statements and those verified empirically (observations)
- Logical positivists only accept 2 forms of verifiable language:
- 1. Analytical propositions (a priori)- knowledge gained through logical definitions/ to deny would be a contradiction. E.g. 'all bachelors are married' = false
- 2. Synthetic propositions (a posteriori)- knowledge could be verified through experience. E.g. could verify a bachelor by checking if they're married.
Verification (principle)
- Ayer (logical positivist) believed empirical methods had to be used to assess if a proposition in principle was verifiable and therefore meaningful
- He argued propositions of science were meaningful- based on experimentation, but RL is meaningless
- Realised we accept some scientific/ historical propositions which have not been verified with certainty. Introduced 2 forms:
- 1. Strong verification- no doubt a statement is true
- 2. Weak verification- some relevant observations to prove true/false
- Some propositions we cannot…
Comments
No comments have yet been made