Asch
- Created by: Mikaela Johnston
- Created on: 27-03-12 15:12
Fullscreen
AIMS CONTEXT
- Conformity- the change in behaviour of the minority to fit the behaviour of the majority
- Jenness 1932 Beans in a Bottle
- Asch said research was limited because a group estimate was asked for
- Aherif 1935 Autokinect effect
- Improvement over Jenness group norm reached of own accord
- Both research are limited Sherif is ambiguous does not reflect real conformity
AIM- Investigate the effect of group pressure in an unambiguous situation he wanted to find when posed with an obviously incorrect answer whether the participant would give a conformed or independant response.
PROCEDURES
- 123 males 7-9 groups of students from local colleges
- Told psychological experiment on visual judgement asked to compare lengths of lines
- 2 white cards 1st standard 2nd showed 3 vertical lines
- Verbally report which lines matched this was repeated 18 times
- Naive participant sat second to last seat unaware of the confederates
- Confederated gave incorrect answers 12 our of 18 critical trials
- Ensured majority of answers were herd before they answered
- 123 participants were naive and could give conformed or inependant response
- Debriefed and interviewed about their responses and behaviour
- Modifications truthful partner gave correct aswer for 6 trials, then conformed or left deserting the naive participant altering the size of the group
FINDINGS CONCLUSION
- Ordinary circumstances less than 1% of mistakes given for correct line
- Proves 36.8% conformed in the critical trials
- 75% conformed at least once 25% never conformed
- Those gave independant response said 'they called the play as they saw it'
- Participants which conformed underestimated the frequency to which…
Comments
No comments have yet been made