Argument from Religious Experience
- Created by: JMitch
- Created on: 22-05-13 12:41
Fullscreen
Argument for God from Religious Experience
William James' Approach
- Wrote Varieties of Religious Experiences and came from not only a Philosophical approach but also a psychological and scientific approach
- Said that all religious experiences are: Noetic, Transcient, Ineffable and Passive
- Accepted that people need 'good dispositions' to contribute as evidence
- Experiences indicate the probability of a 'God' of sorts
- Experiences are essential to religious belief and because they are common then this is good evidence for a higher being
- BUT - James took a pragmatic approach towards religious experiences - the outcome of the experience gives it meaning not its cause
- Also took a pluralistic approach that suggested all religious experiences point towards the same ultimate reality
Swinburne's argument
- Swinburne argued that: 'If there is a God he would make himself know, there are experiences of God, therefore God exists'
- Accepted issues around evidence but had two principles to account for this:
- Principle of Credulity - If there is no evidence to oppose the experience (person…
Comments
No comments have yet been made