- Created by: Guitarlord15
- Created on: 08-03-16 19:27
- Ethical theory that makes use of the principal utility; 'the greatest good/happiness for the greatest number'.
- Teleological: concerned with ends & concequences
- Hedonistic: states that if something brings you happiness= good
- Relative: what's good depends on the situation
- Democratic: majority taken into account
1 of 6
J. Bentham: Act-U (1748-1832)
- Social context of post-industrialisation
- Makes use of Hedonic calculus- 7 criteria which measure happiness in making a moral decision e.g. fecundity, intensity or certainty- a way of quantifying happiness
- Purely relative: aka Act-U; weighs up indivdual action using the principal of utility
- Hedonist approach, but designed to give power to majority e.g. working class maj.- to improve their position in society
- Strenths: relative, democratic & empowers a suppressed maj.
- Weaknesses: could justify the killing of an innocent man 'for the greatest happiness', hedonic calculus is impraticle, too relative- open to interpretation, do concequences always justify the means?,difficault to predict concequences & emotions aren't taken into account.
2 of 6
J.S. Mill: Rule-U
- An improved version of Act.-U. Mill- Bentham's approach lacked the recognition of the deeper levels of human experience.
- Feelings other than happiness are needed for a good life e.g. honour & justice- good whether they bring happiness or not.
- Quality of pleasure more important than quantity
- Divided pleasures into higher/lowers one:
- Higher: use of the higher mental faculties (intellectual) e.g. reading poetry or going to the theatre
- Lower: Fulfil basic human desires & needs (physical) e.g. eating chocolate or procreating
- Moral rules needed in order to establish social order & justice.
- Deontological: concerned with the motive & duty
- Rules formed via the principal of utility & interests of society
- "It's better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied"
3 of 6
Analysis of Mill's approach
- Overcomes problem of minority being sacrificed for the majority
- Mill's theory of justice- everyone is equal; oppses 'greatest happiness for greatest number'
- Less relative & open to different interpretations
- Still concequentialist theory
- (Becomes deontological, not teleological theory)
4 of 6
Strong/weak rule of U
- Strong rule U: should never be disobeyed
- Weak rule U: there may be situations where the better concequences might be achieved by disregarding the role, e.g. better to tell a lie
- Mill wanted to create a society where individuality & talent could florish- aware that rule of majority could prevent that. Thus came up with 'harm principal': the only purpose for which power can be lightfully excersised is any membership of a civilised community against his will, is to prevent harm to others. By this he means the only time power can be used is for the benefit of others.
5 of 6
Modern applications of Utilitarianism
- Motive: as long as the motive was just, the action is good.-Sidgwick e.g. woman and bike scenario
- Preference: the satisfaction of people's preferences rather than aiming to achieve the greatest balance of pleasure over pain- P. Singer.
- Approach- "what's in my own interest?" / "what would I prefer in this situation?"
- R.M. Hare- people are happy happy when they get what they prefere, what what that is might clash with the preference of others. - Need to stand into someone elses shoes & imagine what they'd prefer. We should treat everyone including oursleves with impartiality- equal.
- P. Singer: impartial spectator with a broadly U. approach- we need to take into account all the people affected by our actions; these need to be outweighed & balanced.
- We need choose an act which gives the best possible concequence for those affected; so killing a person wh prefers to live-wrong, albeit it wouldn't be for a person who prefers to die, e.g. suicidal.
6 of 6