LOA: Becket was NOT FULLY JUSTIFIED, as he to fuelled the opposition with his pride preventing negotiation.
Never had the church's theology been pushed furthur- Beckert showed little evidence of compromise which contrasts with Henry's harmonious realtions with Theobald.
Like of compromise led to an increase in tension.
Reson why Becket did not compromise was becuase of his stubborn nature:
Barlow argues the disputes at CLARENDON WERE OUT OF PRIDE NOT PRINCIPLE..
Barlow argues the Exile of Becket was 'CAUSED BY THEIR OWN CHARATCER'
- Conflict driven by Becket failing to negotiate- added 'SAVING MY ORDER' onto the end of the oath of alligience to Henry at Montrail
- This led to an increase in conflict as negotions broke down.
Comments
No comments have yet been made