S1(1) TA 1968: "a person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive."
Actus Reus: (3 parts)
Appropriation - S3 - "assuming the rights of the owner"
- acting as though the property belongs to you (e.g. taking it, using, selling, damaging or destroying it.)
Morris - Held: "you only have to assume one of the rights of the owner for appropriation to occur."
Gomez - current law on appropriation
Held: "even an honest shopper appropriates property by taking an item off the shelf, it is only MR which separates them for a theif"
Hinks - D was a carer of an elderly man, persuaded him to give her gifts of up to £60,000.
confirmed Gomez and went further..
Held: "even a gift can amount to appropriation if it was received dishonestly.
Property - s4 - includes money and all other property including tangible and intangible things.
R v Walsh - urine sample stolen, bodily fluids = property.
Not property:
Oxford v Moss - D stole exam paper, copied it and was caught returning it. Held: D only took knowledge of it, not guilty.
Comments
No comments have yet been made