soic
jhk
- Created by: Stevie Angell
- Created on: 03-05-11 12:17
Parsons
School is a bridge between the damily and a wider societ
Move from particulistic standerds of the family to univerlistic values of society e.g in the family you are special to your parents and you are treated as an indvidual
in society you are judged agaisnt standerds because people dont know you
education is a meritocray - a system based on merits
school assess studetn abilitis and match them up to recent jobs
Davis And Moore 1967
schhols sift and grade puipls according to ability
the most talented get high qualifications which lead to important jobs
important jobs get high rewards
functionalism critisim
durkheim assumes the values transmitted in school are those of society as a whole rather then those of a powerful groups
parsons fails to look at diversity of values in society
many question the idea of education being a meritocracy
social class prevents the education system sifting and grading according to ability - e.g. middle class chrildren do better at school than those from working class familes
New right
Davis and moore - Role allocation
Durkheim - social solidatrity, skills
Parsons - secondry socialisation
New right
The new right have introduced market forces into the running of the education system. To them education should be run like a business - e.g. if schools has to compete with outer school for puipls or for funding they would be forced to be more efficent
this means teachers and administtration will have incentives to imporve standerds
CHUBB AND MOE - this will leas to better school management and higher qualiltiy teaching in order to raise educational standerds
new right conlcudes by saying higher standerds means better qualifications even for those at the bottom. This gives them a chance to escape from walfere dependency
social solidarity
socail unit brinigng evreyone together
value concensus
agreement amoung societys members about what values are important; a sherd culture
collectivism
valueing being part of a group more than suceeding as an individual
anomie
if we did not habe an aducation we would have anomie (chaos)
Education system
What do functionals say?
educations is a good thing which beinifts society and its members
secondry sociliastion
What do marxists say?
education benifits capitalis and is helping create a futre workplace
teachers the hidden curriclem so that chrildren obay authority and in term capatlim
What do feminitsts say?
girls can get equal education to a man
shows images of domanince of men
Durkheim - functionalist
education promots social solidarity
the school is a mini society where chrildren learn how to become adult member of that society and fit in rules, hierachies, exams, assemblies all herlp.
marxist view on education
sees education in a negitive light
there is a myth of meritocracy
post modernist criticese marxist because education now produces diversity not inequality
they see religion as based partly on an unjust and oppressive capitalist society that exploits its workforce
marxism is also criticise for only taking class into consideration and not taking ethnicity and gender as reasons for inequality in education
marxism - bowles and gintis 1967
the corrospondence theory and the hidden cirruclem
They suggest there are close parralls between work ina capatalist society
noth schools and workplace are hiarchies. with head teachers and bosses at the top making decissions and giving orders. and workers and puipls at the bottom obaying
These paraellsor simularites between school and workplace are examples of the corrospondence principle
They belive the corrospondence principle operates throught eh hidden cirrculem e.g. all lessons thet are learnt without being directly taught
schools teach us to be hard working and obident so that we will not challenge authority when we go to work
schools produce a subservient workfource
Comments
Report