Social Psychology Research Studies

?

Sherif, 1935

Aim: To research into the types of social influence/conformity

Method:

  • Pps made estimates of the movement of a spot of light in a dark room
  • The spot wasn't actually moving- Autokinetic effect

Findings:

  • The pps estimates converge into a group norm

Why did they conform?

  • Normative social influence, informational conformity, internalisation, compliance

Weaknesses of study:

  • Low ecological validity, cannot be generalised; gender bias, sample size
  • Low in mundane realism
  • Ambiguous task
  • No actual measurement of conformity
1 of 6

Asch, 1951

Aim: Would people give the wrong answer to a task that had an obvious and unambiguous answer, just becuase everyone else did?

Method:

  • Standard & Comparison cards 
  • For two trials, stooges give correct answer, on the third trial they give wrong answer

Findings:

  • Mean rate of conformity= 32% (1/3 of the times, pps conformed)

Evaluation:

  • Low ecological validity 
  • Low in mundan realsim
  • Demand characteristics
  • Protection of participants
  • Gives a measurement of conformity
  • Non-ambiguous
  • Cross cultural
2 of 6

Zimbardo, 1970s

Aim: To demonstrate the situational causes of negative behaviour

Method: 

  • 75 volunteers asigned either guard or prisoner roles
  • Human rights were suspended; paid $15 a week for 2 weeks
  • Prisoners arrested by real police, 'deloused', given smocks
  • Guards issued uniforms, worked 8 hour shifts

Findings:

  • Terminated after 6 days
  • 'pathological prisoner syndrome'
  • 'pathology of power'
  • Role expectations (identifying with thier roles)

Evaluation:

  • Low ecological validity
  • Zimbardo was involved with the experiment
  • High mundan realism-arrested by real police
3 of 6

Milgram, 1963

Aim: Investigate the nature of obedience in order to understand the inhumane acts carried out by the Germans

Method:

  • 'Experimentor' was a stooge wearing a lab coat, only said 3 phrases
  • Pps were always 'teacher', Stooge was always 'learner'
  • Teacher had to adminster electric shocks for each wrong answer for the word pairs

Findings:

  • Every teacher gave at least 300V
  • 65% gave 450V

Evaluation:

  • Low ecological validity 
  • Low in mundane realism 
  • Systematic and controlled experiment 
  • Milgram had a motive
  • Contributed to understanding of why Nazis behaved the way they did
4 of 6

Hofling, 1966

Aim: 

Method:

  • Nurses in psychiatric hospitals on the night shift
  • A doctor rings 22 times to instruct nurses to give a drug to a patient
  • Hospital rules are:
  • NOT to take instructions over the phone
  • NOT to go over the dose
  • NOT to use unauthorised medicines

Findings:

  • 21 obeyed and broke hospital rules

Evaluation:

  • High in mundane realism-real hospital with real nurses
  • No informed consent
5 of 6

Moscovici & Nemeth again

Aim: To find one of the conditions for minority influence

Method:

  • Mock jury- 4 people & 1 stooge who always gives minority view
  • C1: Given a seat = no influence
  • C2: Chooses seat at head of the table = very influential

Findings:

Conditions needed for minority influence:

  • Consistency
  • Subtlety
  • Flexibilty
  • Autonomy
6 of 6

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Conformity resources »