Asch- wanted to see the impact of conformity during an unambiguous task. pps asked to match a standard line with three comparison lines.
Procedure- tested in groups of seven, whilst six pps were confederates. genuine participant sat last but one. pps asked for their decision on which line was identical in order, going around the table. 12 of the 18 trials were critical trials where the confederates all gave the same wrong answer.
Results- Pps conformed to the group's incorrect judgements in 32% of the trials on average, compared to the control group in which judgements were almost 100% correct. 25% of pps never conformed and 75% conformed at least once. Only 1 in 20 conformed every time.
Conclusion- in a group situation there is a tendency to conform to the judgements of others even when the judgement is clearly incorrect.
Evaluation- limited sample of males, no generalisation.McCarthy era, people scared to stand out. High internal validity = lab experiment. Lacks ecological validity as = lab experiment
Comments
No comments have yet been made