- Created by: DesnieChannel
- Created on: 17-05-17 15:44
Reginald Scot's The Discoverie of Witchcraft, 1584
- Part of a radical protestant sect - the family of love
- Witch-trials at Chelmsford, 1582, 14 arrests and 2 executions
- Supposed witched were suffering from melancholia or delusions
- Those guilty of causing harm were mere tools of the Devil - and those who did harm did so through natural means (poison)
- Catholic Church's sacraments were magic tricks to heighten fear of witches
- Undiscovered elements of nature could explain unknown phenomena
- Ultimately believed in witches but too often blaimed on witches with little/no evidence
- First major work of English sceptism
- James I ordered all copies to be burnt and published Daemonologie as a responce.
- Re-published/became popular in 1651
1 of 5
Harsnett's Fraudulent Practices of J. Darrel, 1599
- The practice of misleading people through magic is nothing new - back to ancient times
- Catholic Priests perform miracles too easily
- Prayer and Exorcism to cast out devils are Catholic tricks - only God can so they're frauds!
- Darrell made William Sommers fake his possession. Harsnett = present at the examination of Darrell and George More.
- His book started an important debate about the nature of witchcraft
- Started "pamphlet war" - Darrell responded with publication in 1600
- Two ministers (Deacon and Walker) questioned if possession was within the Devil's power & demanded proof from Darrell of exorcism (1601)
- Darrell responded to minsters (1602)
- But, Harsnett was still minority opinion - Bishop of Exeter and Norwich supported Darrell.
- He was also deeply religous (conflicting religous views -CoE so hated CC but Catholic sympathies, Darrell= Puriran)
2 of 5
Thomas Ady's A Candle in the Dark, 1656
- The actions of witchfinders and suspicions about witched cannot be found written in Bible
- Wrote as too many wrongful executions as a result of accusations and ridiculous to think ordinary animals = witches familiars
- Magician - false prophets or idolaters = Catholic priests guilty of witchcraft.
- Critises Daemonolgie as no scripture referanced
- Critcal of swimming test and of watching
- Cathoics were first to kill for religion = unchristian!
- The only source Ady uses is the bible - the same as the witchfinders.
- Crucially believed witches existed BUT the definition of a witch in bible isn't what witchfinders use. Witch = no superpowers, but led people to ungodly path - idolaters or through practices associated with CC.
- Minister in Salem who was executed quoted this in his defence.
- Steep decrease in witch trails and ^ in sceptism after 1660 = clear influence of Ady's work.
3 of 5
Webster's Displaying of Supposed Witchcraft, 1677
- Similar to Ady & written in responce to publications that claimed witch-hunts were legit.
- Witches= existed, but no superpower, evil acts, but through own power and no help from Devil
- Critical of Demon Drummer & comments on Pendle Swindle - went to see Edmund but father and uncle wouldn't let them talk + congregation was disturbed by boy's presence.
- Relatively well recieved, and he engaged in public intellectual debates through pamphlets and books.
- Scientific method taken seriously by Royal Society
- Methoical apporach and thoroughh use of evidence- some first hand- set him apart.
- Historian Hugh Trevor-Roper argues the origins of this work lay in Scot's publications and that the intellecutal debate had not progressed since then
- Instead witchcraze declined as the power of the clergy over people's lives decreased in protetant countries - not a coincindence where CC or radical Purtians where influencial, witch craze lasted longer.
4 of 5
Balthasar Bekker's The Enchanted World, 1691
- Bible suggests Devil is in hell for ever and cannot operate on Earth
- Devil = instrument of God's and those who believe the Devil has power is a heretic
- Witches should not be blaimed for events that could be attributed to nature & he believed there was much unknown and so science would one day explain supernatural events
- Undoubtly influenced by Scot, and historians call it the most influential critical work on witchcraft beliefs in the 17th century.
- Witchcraft = impossible
- Used Bible as primary source and tried an unbias approach
- Bekker's work coincided with changes already happening from the new scientic approaches
- End of c17 = crucial! advancements meant now could explain some of the mysterious events
- 2 months- 4000 copies sold
- Limited in England but worried German witch hunters - German towns banned it
5 of 5