Gives words their plain, ordinary, gramatical meaning even if it makes the law absurd.
- Viscount simmonds: If there are errors in the law it is parliaments job to correct them, and for judges to change the wording of an act of parliament is a "naked ursupation of the legislative function."
But using the literal rule can lead to unsatisfactory results: Whitely v Chappel - used a dead persons name to vote twice - law said a dead person cannot vote and so found him not guilty.
Ad: - Leaves law making to parliament - Viscount Simmonds
Dis: - Can lead to absurdities and harsh decisions
- Assumes that every act is perfectly worded - Whitely v Chappel (not what parliament intended so it had to be adapted with the golden rule)
Comments
No comments have yet been made