to see if psychiatric diagnosis is accurate, reliable and affected by bias. also to investigate what life is like inside a psychiatric hospital.
1 of 6
SAMPLE
DOCTORS AND NURSES who worked in 12 hospitals across 5 states. A range of hospitals were used: old, new, understaffed, lots of staff.
the sample is not the pseudo patients.
2 of 6
PROCEDURE
8 pseudo patients (confederates) - 3 women and 5 men with no history of mental health
ppts telephoned one of the 12 hospitals for an appointment and arrived at the admissions office complaining they had been hearing voices say "empty" "hollow" "thud".
they gave a false name and job but all other details were true
all were admitted with a diagnosis of schizophrenia except one who received manic depression
once admitted, they stopped producing symptoms and behaved how they normally would
they spent their time making notes about life inside the hospital and trying to convince staff of their sanity
3 of 6
RESULTS
none of the patients were detected and were discharged with a diagnosis of being in remission. on average remained in hospital for 19 days
many real patients suspected the pseudo patients sanity
patients were treated by staff in a way that was consistent with their diagnosis
depersonalisation by staff was an issue as patients were ignored 71% of the time, eye contact was made only 23% of the time with a verbal response in 2% of cases.
0/185 questions were answered by staff
2/2000 tablets administered were taken showing lack of supervision
4 of 6
FOLLOW UP STUDY
a leading institution agreed to do a similar study as they thought it would be unlikely that they could be fooled.
staff were asked to rate on a 10 point scale the probability that each patient could be a pseudo patient.
over a 3-month period, 193 patients were assessed and 41 were judged to be false by at least 1 member of staff and 19 by at least 2.
no pseudo patients were sent to hospital.
5 of 6
CONCLUSION
Rosenhan concluded that diagnostic processes like DSM lead to inaccurate outcomes making the system less valid as they demonstrate a failure to detect sane patients.
behaviour displayed after a patient has been labelled with a mental disorder is then interpreted in a way that is consistent with their diagnosis as the perception of the person has altered.
this could lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy in that people respond to how they are treated and so the diagnosis becomes confirmed as they display behaviour that fits the label.
hospitals are more likely to make type 2 errors saying that there is no disorder when there is when they are being watched as they are more cautious with their diagnosis but make more type 1 errors in everyday diagnoses as it easier to admit a patient than to send them away.
Comments
No comments have yet been made