Rocky Shores

?
  • Created by: rosieevie
  • Created on: 29-05-17 13:37

Biodiversity

Phyla in rocky intertidal shore:

  • Mollusca
  • Arthropoda
  • Chordata
  • Echinodermata
  • Cnidaria
  • Porifera

Macrofauna/flora - animals/algae over 1mm

Meiofauna - animals/algae under 1mm size

  • Ostracods
  • Amphipods
  • Gastropods
  • Forams
  • Diatoms
1 of 16

Primary Producers

Macroalgae - seaweeds and divided into Rhodophyta (red), Chlorophyta (green) and Phaeophyta (brown)

Form species-specific zones between upper and lower shore - giant biomass

Not that important for direct energy supply - most biomass is degraded to detritus and exported to detrital food chain

Seaweeds - 3 methods to survive from grazers

  • Escape into inaccessible crevices
  • Tolerance
  • Deterrence - structural (calcareous elements) and chemical defences

Kelp forests - subpolar regions and 20C summer isotherms except for upwelling in subtropical 

Benthic microalgae prevalent on wave-swept shores

Phytoplankton imported with tides - provides food for suspension feeders

2 of 16

Grazers

Intertidal regions - limpets and periwinkles

Subtidal - sea urchins

Dominant grazers are molluscs

Limpets' radula teeth = hardest biomaterial on Earth

Grazers feed on biofilms and seaweed fronds

3 of 16

Filter Feeders

Sponges, mussels, barnacles (dominant), tube worms, sea squirts

Most sessile

Situate themselves where water movement supplies with plankton and detritus in suspension

4 of 16

Predators

Dogwhelks - radular drills circular holes in shells

Shore crabs - pincers crack open shells

Starfish - evert stomachs

Oystercatchers - thick beaks crack shells

Humans

Important role in structuring communities - starfish control barnacle lines on shores

Dogwhelk radular feeding - fossils found with circular holes in

5 of 16

Zonation

Species distributed vertically according to capability to cope physiologically w/ changes to biotic/abiotic interactions

Vertical extent of shore - increase from few metres (sheltered) to 30m (extremely exposed)

Ballantine Scale - describes changes in distribution of dominant sessile animals/seaweed in relation to tidal height/horizontal gradient of wave exposure

Moderately exposed shores - distinct vertical zones, characterised by indicator organisms

Patterns or vertical zonation caused by:

  • Larval settlement/adult preference
    • Unlimited recruitment/limited space = lower limits set by dominant competitor presence
    • Zonation breaks down w/ low recruitment - no space competition
  • Physiological tolerance to variables
    • Stress increased closer organism is to land
    • Emersion = heat and desiccation stress - bufffered by seaweed canopies and crevices
    • Topography and aspect - affect heat/light levels
6 of 16

Zonation

    • Behaviours/morphological adaptations - modify distributions
      • Moving into crevices
      • Mushrooming
      • Inhabiting rock pools
      • Hiding under algal canopies
    • High water (spring tides) = higher upper limits for species
  • Biological interactions - interspecific competition, predation and growth
    • Supply-side ecology - recruit supply influence zonation patterhsn

Upper limits of zonation - physical factors 

Lower limits of zonation - biological factors

Exceptions - limpet distribution set by predation on upper and competition for space on lower

7 of 16

Larval Ecology - Direct Developing

Direct developing - juveniles hatch from eggs and crawl away - dogwhelks

  • Positives
    • Predictable food source
    • No water column predators
    • Entire life cycle in 1 area
    • Suitable habitat when hatched
  • Negatives
    • Large energetic cost for mothers
    • Few eggs produced
    • Poor dispersal - limited gene exchange
    • Benthic predators
8 of 16

Larval Ecology - Lecithotrophic

Leithotrophic - larvae planktonic using yolk-sac as nourishment e.g. limpets

  • Positives
    • Own food supply
    • Less time as plankton = less time for predation
    • Close to suitable habitat
  • Negatives
    • Fewer larvae produced
    • Lower dispersal distances
9 of 16

Larval Ecology - Planktotrophic

Planktotrphic - larvae free-swimming and feeding

  • Positives
    • Large number produced (scattergun approach)
    • Stay in water column for long time - high dispersal distances from parents
  • Negatives
    • Unpredictable food source
    • Long exposure to predators
    • Last development stage timed when suitable habitat found for settlement - high probability of missing mark
10 of 16

Larval Ecology

70% bethic invertebrates - planktonic larvae

Larval settlement not random - chemical and physical cues

Theories on bi-phasic life history (larval and adult) evolved:

  • Different food sources - reducing competition
  • Pelagic larvae disperse long distances - colonisation of new regions = increase gene flow
  • Break parasitic life cycles
  • Pelagic larvae - no benthic predators
11 of 16

Community Interactions

Competition important where resources limit

Primary limiting resource - space

3 types of competition:

  • Exploitative - ability to harvest limiting food resources
  • Pre-emptive - compeititor recruits and dominantes space
  • Interference - compeitior physically contests resources

Large size/rapid growth = competitive dominance

Adults can somtimes outcompete juveniles or different sexes (sexual dimorphism)

12 of 16

Role of Grazers

Dominant grazers = limpets - shown by marks on rocks by radula

Only female territorial - defend their 'garden', knocking competitiors off their home range

Owl limpets - important Californian grazer

  • Larger owl limpets = grazer large areas than smaller individuals = home range scaling
  • Larger limpets more likely to be harvested for food = amount of grazing space reduced
  • Females eaten first - bigger = male take over old home range and become female
  • Other species will colonise - limpets may not regain large territories 
  • = Many small territories

Home range scaling - the larger an organism the larger its' home range is because of more food it needs to eat

13 of 16

Role of Predators

Rocky shore communities are complex - direct and indirect species interaction effects

Predators can mediate interactions between competitors - otherwise competitive exclusion occurs

= Hierarchy of compeitive and predatory relationships develop

Structure of communities is complex of:

  • Recruitment success (supply-side ecology)
  • Resources
  • Growth rates and body size/shape
  • Competitive ability
  • Biodiversity
  • Predatory effects
  • Disturbance
14 of 16

Biogeography

Biogeography - study of geographical distribution of fauna and flora

Range limit - geographical boundary beyond which a species doesn't occur

Species range limits affected by life history, population genetics, abundance distribution, spatial availability of habitats, oceanographic/atmospheric factors

Habitat gaps - caused by short dispersal period for larvae

British Isles - transition zone between 2 community types - warm southern species and boreal cold north species

Souther Africa - Benguela upwelling affects primary production, biomass, offshore flow and diversity - West coast has high productivity and East coast has low

15 of 16

Humans and Rocky Shores

Affect rocky shores:

  • Climate change - marine and atmospheric changes - alters biogeography (southern warm species moving north)
  • Ocean acidification
  • Harvesting - size-selective harvesting catches bigger ones first
    • Easy to catch and constant food source
    • Evidence of human beginnings shown in shellfish fossil size range - potentially influenced human brain development
  • Trampling
  • Pollution
  • Artificial substrates e.g. rip rap, groynes
    • Biodiversity similar to natural
    • Increases habitat availability
    • Reduces habitat gaps - increases geographic ranges
    • Connects populations = gene flow
    • Invasive species can use as stepping stones
16 of 16

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Marine Science resources:

See all Marine Science resources »See all Rocky Shore Ecology resources »