reliability and validity

HideShow resource information


  • reliabilty is the consistencey of the results are the same.
  • test re-test: is when you test the same participants some time after the original study: usually a week or so: for the results to be reliable the participants should get the same score that they did before.
  • split half: compares a participants performance on two halves of a test or questionnaire- there should be a close correlation between scores on both halves of the test. questions in both halves should be of equal quality for good internal reliabilty.
  • inter- rater reliability: refers to the consistency of a researchers behaviou. a researcher should produce similar test results etc in the same way as another researcher. consistency improves reliability.
  • increase reliability by standardising instructions and carry out a pilot study to improve the procedures and the materials.
1 of 2


  • internal validity= the tool is measuring what it intended to
  • external validity= the findings can be generalized beyond the context of the research situation.
  • face validity= does the measuring tool appear to be doing what it should? one or more judges assess whether the test seems appropriate and suggest changes if necessary.
  • concurrent validity= established by comparing performance on a new questionnaire with a previously established test on the same topic.
  • predicitive validity= can an intelligance test at age 3 predict academic performance at 21?
  • temporal (historical) validity= do our findings endure over time or they era- dependent?
  • context validity, better known as:
  • ecological validity= can we apply our findings to other contexts and situations outside of the research setting?
  • population validity= can we generalise findings from our research particpants to other population groups?
2 of 2


No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »