The assessment of scientific work by others who are specialist in the same field to ensure that any research intended for publication is of a high quality.
Aims of peer review:
- To decide whether to allocate research funding for a project
- To validate the quality and relevance of the research, for example: is the hypothesis and methodology appropriate and are findings drawn accurately.
- To suggest amendments or improvements to the research
(-) peer may use their anonymity to criticise rival researchers- especially is there is competition for funding
(-) publication bias- there is a tendancy for journals to publish positive results- it is therefore too selective and may mean that important findings are being ignored
(-) peer may be critical of research which contradicts their own view- so the findings that are in line with current opinion are more likely to get published/passed than new research that challenges current opinions. Therefore it might slow down the rate of change.
Comments
No comments have yet been made