Punishment in the Community
0.0 / 5
- Created by: xoemmamcl
- Created on: 05-12-18 14:24
What could punishment in the community involve?
Community sanctions –
- supervised/probation
- unpaid work,
- curfew
- programmes
- treatment.
- “Mass supervision” – increase in scale and intensity.
- “Mass Incarceraton” – neglect of supervision.
1 of 13
Alternative to prison? Probation and Parole
- Probation and parole – alternative to incarceration.
- Probation – instead of jail time.
- Parole – early release from prison.
- Demise of this? – “Nothing works” - Robert Martinson (1974) – treatment of offenders failed to have any change on reoffending rates.
- “What works” – looking at what does work for reducing reoffending. – looking at underlying causes of crime, making sure the cost of offending outweighs the benefits and making reoffending more difficult by taking away any opportunity.
- There was resistance in scotland – led to introduction of community payback orders.
2 of 13
Criticisms
- Higher levels of insecurity, crime and punishment more politicised and more punitive policies to show state power (Garland, 1996).
- Problem for the public – seen as too soft, more focus on evidence-base and assessing risk of people.
3 of 13
Community Punishments in E&W
- Conditional Discharge
- Fine
- Compensation
- Unpaid work
- Rehab
- Curfew
4 of 13
Further developments of punishment in the communit
- This is new punitiveness and new penology.
- Opportunity to demonstrate can avoid further offending
- Held accountable through supervision.
- Supervision involves monitoring with encouragement and assistance (help as well as supervision. Supervisors motivate and persuade).
- Not purely punitive (like a fine).
5 of 13
Theoretical Perspectives
Foucault
- Corporal to Carceral punishment
Skull
- Decarceration – removing people from prisons to mental institutions – cost saving but spending has increased and applies more to mental health.
Cohen
- Dispersal of discipline – Foucault argues that this has now dispersed through society, penetrating every institution to reach every individual.
- Net widening – more people controlled by the justice system – the growth of mass incarceration has neglected mass supervision.
6 of 13
Theoretical Perspectives
Foucault
- Corporal to Carceral punishment
Skull
- Decarceration – removing people from prisons to mental institutions – cost saving but spending has increased and applies more to mental health.
Cohen
- Dispersal of discipline – Foucault argues that this has now dispersed through society, penetrating every institution to reach every individual.
- Net widening – more people controlled by the justice system – the growth of mass incarceration has neglected mass supervision.
7 of 13
Punishment in the community in Scotland
- Less populist approach to punishment
- Highest imprisonment rates.
- More interested in reducing reoffending, giving individual support to prisoners and increasing public confidence.
8 of 13
How does Scotland do this?
- Through community payback orders – constructive way to repair harms caused by crime, making good to the victim or community.
- Scottish prison commission – one of the best ways to pay back is to turn their live around.
- Scotland v England – constructive punishment to help stop reoffending v merely punitive punishment – no support to offenders to help them stop reoffending. – (Duff, 2011).
9 of 13
Community Sanctions in Scotland
- Community Unpaid Work
- Home detention curfews.
- Electronic Monitoring (tags).
10 of 13
Desistance Paradigm
- Interventions should be based on offenders understanding of their individual change process and how experts can help with that rather than fitting offenders with already made interventions – base it on their needs.
- Focuses on networks and hooks in peoples lives that may stop them from reoffending – it is important to be able to have the opportunity to desist, offenders need to be motivated, be ready to change.
- This wont happen quickly – there is a zig-zag process – many offenders may slip back into old habits and begin offending again and have relapses, it is important to not give up on this.
- These interventions are not concerned solely with the prevention of further offending – want to be able to address the harms by encouraging offenders to make good through community service.
11 of 13
How can practitioners meet individual needs?
- Barry (2007) - Offenders want to have trust in the community punishments.
- Want people to listen to them and not judge them, want actvities to relives boredom. – meet individual needs.
12 of 13
Other Points
- Welfarist ethos survives to a greater degree in Scotland than elsewhere in UK.
- Purposes of community sentences (shifts over time).
13 of 13
Related discussions on The Student Room
- lnat essay feedback »
- islam and christian »
- My brother has been arrested for assault »
- HELP: GCSE History Edexcel Grade 9 Facts »
- QMUL or Newcastle University? »
- What do you think I would get on these practise questions? C+P Edexcel »
- Is it worth applying to Cambridge? »
- Choosing a University »
- An Inspector Calls »
- Cold War 8 marker - can someone read what I've written and feedback? »
Similar Criminology resources:
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
Comments
No comments have yet been made