psychology research paper 1

  • Created by: Ems9
  • Created on: 11-06-18 16:50

Conformity- Asch

AIM- whether people would conform to a majority's incorret answer of an ambiguous task

METHOD- lab, independent groups design

                 judge line length, comparison against standard line, say out loud

                 each group had onlyone participant, went last 

                18 trials, 12 confererates gave same wrong answer 

FINDINGS- control trial, gave wrong answer 0.7%

                  critical trial, gave wrong answer 37%, 75% conformed at least once

CONCLUSION- participants conformed to majoritydue to normative social influence 

1 of 14

Conformityto social roles- Zimbardo

AIM- see if people would conform to assigned social roles

METHOD- male students, volunteer, either prisoner or guard in mock prison, randomly assigned

                prisoners arrested, treated like real prisoners, guards had unifrom ( bat, glasses)

FINDINGS- study stopped after 6 days instead of intended 14

                   day 1, prisoner released, psychological disturbance 

                   day 2, prisoners rebelled, ripped uniforms, shout, swore

                   after rebellion prisoners quiet and anxious

                   day 4, two prisoners released

CONCLUSION- adopted social roles quickly

                         social roles can influence behaviour

2 of 14

Obedience to authority- Milgram

AIM- why did German's obey Hitler during the Holoaust?

METHOD- lab, 40 male volunteers, 'memory study'

                participant and confederate given roles in rigged draw, participant always teacher

                learner strapped into electric chair, teacher given small shock

                learner get question wrong, had to 'shock' them, from 15 to 450V

                at 300V learner pound on wall

FINDINGS- 65% went to full 450V

                  100% went to 300V

CONCLUSION- ordinary people obey orders to hurt someone een if it goes against their conscience

3 of 14

Authoritarian personality- Adorno

AIM- understand the anti-semitism of the Holocaust

METHOD- causes of obedient personality in 2000 middle class white americans 

                looked at unconscious attitude to racial groups

                developed fascism scale, measured authoritarian personality 

FINDINGS- high score on F-scale, identified with strong people, contemptuous of weak

                 strong positive correlation between authoritarianism and prejudice

4 of 14

Duration of STM- Peterson & Peterson

AIM- find the duration of short term memory 

METHOD- participants shown trigrams, recall after 3 6 9 12 15 or 18 seconds

                 during pause count backwards in 3s- interference task

FINDINGS- 3 seconds- 80% correct

                  18 seconds- 10% correct

CONCLUSION- short term memory has a duration of up to 30 seconds 

5 of 14

Capacity and Duration of LTM- Bahrick et al

AIM- find out the capacity and duration of long term memory 

METHOD- 392 american high school graduates aged 17to 74

                 used yearbooks, recall- asked for names for photo

                                           recognition- match name to photo

FINDINGS- within15 years of leaving 90%

                   within 30 years 

6 of 14

Capacity STM- Jacobs

AIM- find out the capacity of short term memory 

METHOD- read a sequence of letters

                 repeat back in correct order, sequence increased in digits each time

FINDINGS- could recall 9 digits

                   recall 7 letters 

CONCLUSION- STM has a limited capacity of 7 +/- 2

7 of 14

Coding of STM and LTM- Baddeley

AIM- to find out how LTM and STM is coded

METHOD- given four sets of words, acoustically similar or dissimilar, semantically similaror dissimilar

                 asked to recal either imediatley or after 20 mins

FINDINGS- had problems recalling acoustically similar words immediatley

                   had problems recalling semantically similar words after 20 mins

CONCLUSION- STM codes acoustically

                         LTM codes semantically 

8 of 14

Retroactive interference- Postman

AIM- how retroactive interference affects learning 

METHOD- lab experiment 

                 two groups, remember a list of paired words

                 experimental group given second list to learn 

                 recall first list 

FINDINGS- recall of control group was more acurate 

CONCLUSION- learning of second list interfered with recall of the first list 

9 of 14

State dependent forgetting- Carter and Cassaday

AIM- investigate state dependent forgetting

METHOD- gave anti-histamine drugs to participants 

                 creates an internal physiological state different to normal 

                 had to learn list of words then recall

                 4 conditions

FINDINGS- when conditions were mismatched for learning and recall, recall was worse

CONCLUSION- state can affect recall 

10 of 14

Eye Witness Testimony- Loftus and Palmer

AIM- investigate how EWT can be distorted using leading questions 

METHOD 1- participants shown video ofmultiple car crashes

                    asked series of questions

                   ' how fast do you think the cars were going when they HIT?'

                   hit replaced by smashed, collided, bumped, collided for each condition

FINDINGS 1- smashed, 41mph

                     contacted, 32mph

METHOD 2- 3 groups, smashed, hit, and no verb

                    asked 'did you see any broken glass?' 

Findings- smashed, more likely to say yes to seeing glass

11 of 14

Weapon focus effect- Loftus

AIM- does weapon focus effect affect acuracy of EWT?

METHOD- independent groups design, two groups

                 group 1, overhear discussion, man leaves room with pen and greasy hands

                 group 2, overhear discussion, man leaves room with bloody knife

                 asked to identify man 

FINDINGS- group 1,49% accurate 

                   group 2, 33% accurate

CONCLUSION- when anxious witnesses focus on weapon at the expense of other factors

12 of 14

Effect of the cognitive interveiw- Geiselman et al

AIM- does the cognitive interview improve the accuracy of EWT?

METHOD- staged situation, man with blue bag stole slide projector

                after 2 days participants questioned

              questioned using either standard procedure or cognitive interview technique

              told bag was green, then asked what colour the bag was?

13 of 14


14 of 14


No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Core studies resources »