INTRO: Post-modern approach= doubts research into interpersonal relationships---need to be considered in terms of context or environment context of relationship= differs from culture to culture Individualistic and collectivist diffences------------HOFSTEDE(1984) (1) Romance (2) Extended Families (3) Norms And Rules
(1) Romance----western- choice in partner= love----think this applies to all cutures: evidence not SHAVER, WU & SCHWARTZ: Cultural differnces- China= pain and sorrow associated with love Eastern & Western- E=Collectivist W= Individualistic LEVINE:Postive correlation between love and individualsm= +0.56- individualsim & love(USA, Brazil, England e.t.c) IMPLICATION: Too SIMPLISTIC, blinded by love Voluntary & Non-Voluntary: wetern=urban settings, large number of people Non- western= lees urban------pool of potential people=diferent Arrange marrige= non-western YELSMA & ATHAPPILY: Indian and North American marriges=no difference in love GUPTA & SINGH: Differnt conclusions= love in indian marrige (half=arranged), SHORT Term & Long Term PROBLEMS: social desirability,no relevant answers Continuity & Discontinuity: duration of relationship varies in cultures e.g.China,divorce=shameful-----rate divorce=4% America=40-50% GOODWIN
Comments
No comments have yet been made