psychology and the courtroom - crime
- Created by: sophiehartley
- Created on: 13-06-18 15:57
Background
Characteristics of witnesses:
- Witness confidence = more confident witness is a more accurate witness.
- Penrod and Cutler - mock trial experiment for a robbery. When witness was 80% confident there was 60% conviction. When 100% confident there was 67% conviction.
- Language use - Lakoff studied the effect of frequent hedges (I think, maybe). Both male and female witnesses who used these were perceieved as less intelligent + less believable
Characteristics of suspects:
- Attractiveness = Dion et al coined the "halo effect", "what is beautiful is good".
- Sigall and Ostrove - lab, 120 students, IV = type of crime/attractiveness, DV = sentence. Burglary or fraud. Lower for buglary (2.8) for attractive, higher for fraud (5.45)
- Castellow et al - 71m 74f East Carolina uni, lab exp, rate guiltiness of sexual harrass with unattractive/attractive victim and suspect. Combination of attractive V and unattractive D = higher % of guilt. Assumed attractive victim = more innocent.
- Accent = certain accents perceived more positive than others.
- Seggie - tape recordings Australian, British RP and Asian. Aus = assault. Brit = fraud.
Key Research: Dixon et al
Aim: investigate impact of accent, race and type of crime on guilt
Hypothesis: Brummie suspect would be more guilty than standard accent.
Sample: 119 undergraduate students from University of Worcester (24m 95f) Those from Birmingham were removed from study.
Research Method: lab exp, independent measures, 3 IVs = accent (Brummie/Standard, race (black/white), type of crime (robbery/fraud). DV = participant's attributions of guilt.
Procedure: 2 minute recorded transcript between middle-aged male officer and young male suspect pleaing innocence. IVs were all varied within the transcript creating 8 different versions. Once listened to recording, they completed 2 rating scales: level of guilt on 7-point rating scale and speech evaluation instrument measuring superiority, attractiveness and dynamism.
Results: Brummie suspect more guilty. Higher ratings for Brummie/black/burglary. Brummie rated low on superiority.
Conclusions: a range of social psychological factors can influence perceptions of guilt, accent, race and type of crime.
Strategies to influence jury decision making
- Attractiveness - could influence jurors, lawyers do get their clients to present themsevles in the most positive way - evidence from Sigall and Ostrove and Castellow et al.
- Order of testimony - story order (order of events) or witness order (presented in sequence more likely to persuade jury e.g. best until last).
- Pennington and Hastie - story order vs witness order. 130 students from USA in mock murder trial. Tape recordings presented in 4 different conditions.
- Prosecution = SO, defence = WO
- Prosecution = SO, defence = SO
- Prosecution = WO, defence = SO
- Prosecution = WO, defence = WO
- ppts taken individually to answer written Qs, guilty or not guilty and rate confidence on 5 point rating scale.
- Results showed that prosecution using SO and defence using WO guilty verdicts returned 78% of the time (P won). Defence using SO and prosecution using WO guilty verdicts returned 31% of the time (D won). When both used the same strategy, guilty verdicts were around 60%.
- Therefore, the use of story order could be a strategy to persude juries. It is easier for them to understand + make sense of evidence. But no advantage if both sides use it
- Pennington and Hastie - story order vs witness order. 130 students from USA in mock murder trial. Tape recordings presented in 4 different conditions.
Evaluation
Socially sensitive: causes implications for the ppts and who the findings generalise to
- Seggie - British RP guilty of fraud, broad Aus guilty of assault. This is ** as it assumes those with broad Aus more likely to commit blue-collar crimes, and British = white-collar
- Dixon et al - Brummie accent more likely to be seen as guilty of committing crimes. ** leads to labelling and being discriminated against due to their accent, people treat them differently e.g. not serving them in pubs etc.
- Could be +ve inform legal teams about guilt can be influenced by extra-legal factors. Also, raise awareness in schools about prejudice. Could use voice-changing softwarre so jurors don't actually hear the accent.
Ethnocentrism: all the research is from UK, US or Australia. Ethnocentric to assume that a jury's decisions in different countries and cultures may be affected by the same factors. May only affect jurors in western countries. Need to investigate jury decisions in a range of countries/cultures.
Validity: ecological validity extent to which study reflects real life. Low EV because Castellow's research is a mock trial, only shown photos. Not reflective of a real trial. But allows comparisons among different conditions which couldn't be manipulated in real life.
Related discussions on The Student Room
- Criminology At University »
- Changing uni course »
- Psychology and Criminology Degree »
- Liverpool Hope University or Liverpool John Moores University »
- Take your first steps towards becoming a Forensic Psychologist »
- university »
- Recomended Universities for Criminology »
- HELPPPP what to take in college?! »
- Forensic psychology- 5ps of formulation »
- course choice criminal justice w forensic psychology/crim w psych »
Comments
No comments have yet been made