Personal Rule: Religion
- Created by: Kate H
- Created on: 09-04-15 13:25
Religious Policies
Supression of preaching
- 1629 ordered catechizing replaces sermons
- Each lecturer read liturgy printed by authority in his surplice
- Laud supressed feoffees in fear they would cause unrest- no evidence- one left for New World
Changes to services
- Uniform by strict adherence to prayer book, bowing in name of Jesus
- Altar railed at east end of church permanently creating impression minister seperate from flock
- Implied eucharist sacrificial- like Catholic mass
- Reissue of Book of Sports; Stained gass; organs and choir stalls
- Unpopular with gentry
'Thorough' enforcement of changes
- All bishops to live in diocese
- Court of High Commision for clergy infringing church laws (prerogative court)
- Fearsome reputation- abolished in 1641 parliament- some clergy fled
Opposition #1
Popularity
- Some liked new ritual and Book of Sports gave chance to relax
Many offended
- Alienated sections of population; people having to change beliefs they grew up with; offence to interpet 39 Artcles in a predestination sense, though this was common years before
Emigration
- To New England increased markedly - only answer- as many as 15,000 in 1637
Puritan pamphlets & Prynne, Burton Bastwick
- Bishops described as 'tigers' and 'vipers' but could result in harsh punishment
- P, B, B 1637 tried in Star Chamber ears cut off
Opposition#2
Gentry's class-based opposition to Laud
- Gentlemen should not have such a punishment
- Seemed to be attacking position and property rights- not even gentry himself
Gentry's opposition to restoration of wealth of Church
- Wanted to restore wealth to improve status of clergy
- Restrictions on terms which ecclesiastical landlords could offer their tenants> tenants who lost out gentry
- Unsuccessful attempts to recover impropriations to provide money for clergy stipends- at gentry's expense since they brought up impropriations
Gentry's dislike of Armininanism
- Blurred social distinictions which Puritanism hightlighted- social snobs. Eg. Norwich diocese pews ordred to be uniform size so as not to block view of altar- offended community leaders who wanted to show their importance
- Book of Sports threatened their law enforcement role - disorder
Fear of Catholicism
- Ceremonial of Arminianism and Catholics at court> belief of Popish plot
Charles and the Catholics
Charles' View
- Tolerant but wanted outward conformity and submission- could be saved as long as 'a man belived in Christ'
Double Standard
- Country Catholics subjected to fines- incomes from recusancy from £6000 in 1631 to £32000 in 1640
- Catholic worship allowed at court ; mass in Chapel for H.Maria or ambassadors e.g Somerset House
- Number of highly visible conversions
Perception
- Impression of popery despite fines, ban on Jesuits etc.Laud's habit of calling clergy 'priests'
- Seemed plausible given influcence ofn Queen and Cath. success in 30YW
Laud's view and misunderstandings
- Fierce opponent of Catholicism ; Pope thought he was Cath and offereed cardinal's hat
Court- Papal evoys from 1634; Weston and Cottingon open or secret Catholics; Charles foreign policy of aligning with Catholic powers; influence of Hn. Mari
Anti-Popery and Popish Plot
Numbers 60,000 Catholics- just 2% of population
Scares and fears
- Protestants felt under threat
- Foxe's Book of Martyrs- torments of Protestants in 16th Cent.
- Series of alarms from 1580s- Armada, Gunpowder Plot, invasion scares 1620s
- Before 1625 all external, either from abroad of those who felt felt excluded from political process
- New fear Catholics had infected the heart of the government
Increased fears after 1637
- Catholic influence on policy seemed undeniable
- Misguided attempt to impose Scottish prayer book- seen as Popish
- Negotiating with Catholic Spain for money to supress Prot. subejcts although came to nothing
- War with Scots: Charles seemed interested in Catholic military support in Ireland and Scotland letting H.Mar ask for Cath donation
- Traditional King/Parl alliance in war under threat
- Arrival of Catholic Queen Mother at height of Scottish crisis/ Charles in north/Arrival of Spanish fleet
Anti-Popery- impact of religious fears on Short Pa
- Lasted a month
- Abrupt dissolution and presence of three Spanish envoys led to rumors Parliament had fallen due to a popish plot and lots of speculations
- Londoners petitioned that the Catholics should be forced to wear distinguishing clothes
- Atmosphere of hysteria destroyed chance of moderate and accomodating parliament in Long Parliament
- John Pym in opening speech said 'design to altar the kingdom both in religion and government' - if these were King's policies the king was guilty of treason
- No popish plot- commitment to Protestant cause
- Couldn't express his policies or beliefs in a way that would be understood
Religious Policy in Ireland
Catholics
- Allowed to practice unmolested because Presbyterian settlers in Ultster seen as more of a threat
Church of Ireland
- Directed reforms here to bring it closer to CoE and limit influence of Presbyterians
- Had stong Calvinist beliefs to assert itself against Catholic majority
- Arminians appointed to vacant bishoprics in opposition to Calvinst AB Usher
- Arminian imposition unpopular with Irish Church but no means of protest
Puritan opposition
- Crushed by Court of High Commision; lost livings if didn't reform; no effective way to protest
Wentworth's land reforms
- Those who might have supported alienated by campaign to win back church lands to allievate poverty of clergy
- Lay people had church lands and attack made enemies such as Earl of Coke
- United many groups against government
Religious Policy in Scotland 1
Church of Scotland
- Presbyterianism supported by vast majority of population
- Successful reform would require close consultation with important General Assembly
- Charles not sensitive
1626 Articles of Perth
- Commanded observation of Articles of Perth and kneeling at communion
- Insensitive and demonstrated his poor understanding of how this would anger Scots
1633 visit
- First visit since becoming King, with Laud, shocked at plainess of churches- devoid of ornament
- Returned determined to make them conform to their ideas
Religious Policy in Scotland 2
New Scottish Book of Common Prayer and canons
- "for the uniformity of...discpline" Laid down east end tables, kneelin and confesion-offence
- Lack of consultation with clergy and imposition by royal decree
- Avoided words such as 'priest' but rumors of 'popish rites' and not prepared to give it a go
- Seen as English imposition which would lead to error
Charles' mishandling of 1637 Petition
- Condemned prayerbook for 'sowing the seeds...contarty to true religion'
- Involvement of bishops in p.b prep damaged their weak position
- Charles had undone James' reforms and drove a wedge between Scottish/Eng Churches
National Covenant
- To oppose prayerbook and bound subscribers to maintain true faith of the kirk against 'innovations and evils' led to Bishop's War
- Charles' ill judged religious policy in Scotland which brought an end to personal rule
Convocation and Canons
Convocation causes unease
- Clergy immediately granted six subsidies while secular counterparts discussed grievancesSP
- Changes in church since 1606 meant parliament wished to assert their authority in religious matters and unwilling to leave direction of church to convocation
- Continued to sit after dissolution of parliament so canons had dubious legality
Laud's aims and what the canons said
- Hoped they would provide peace in the Church
- Codemned popery and deliberately moderate: position of table 'indifferent' too little too late
What the Oath of Allegiance said and why it backfired
- Probably intended in same moderate way; preventing all innovations in doctrine and government of the church; supposed to secure men of suspicion of revolt to Popery and required them to swear they "approved the doctrine...consent to alter government by archbishops, bishops etc"
- etc interpreted as Pope and became known as etcetera oath - plot to destroy protestant church
- Puritan pamphlets showing backfire in Laud's face; oath abandoned
- Convocation and canons merely inflamed passions and drove sides further apart
Related discussions on The Student Room
- OCR A-level History British period study and enquiry: All exams 10th Jun 2022 »
- MY YEAR 12 JOURNAL!!!! (Grow your grades) »
- A-level History Study Group 2023-2024 »
- A level history coursework »
- OCR AS-Level History Unit 1 (Y136-Y138,Y143) - 17th May [Exam Chat] »
- AQA A-Level History 1D and 2O Notes »
- AQA A Level History Paper 1 (7042/1A to 1L) - 24 May 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- OCR A Level History Non-British period study: All Exams - 22 Jun 2022 [Exam Chat] »
- OCR A-Level History Unit 1 (Y101-Y113) - 9th June 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- Will you feel British without the monarchy? »
Comments
No comments have yet been made