Non Verbal Communication Case Studies
- Created by: saffrondhanda29
- Created on: 01-02-18 17:31
Argyle, Alkema and Gilmour -Verbal Communication
Aim: To see if tone of voice effects interpreting a verbal message
Method: Diff groups of particapents listened to either friendly or hostile messages spoken in either friendly or hostile tones.
Results: When particapents asked to interpret messages, tone of voice had 5 times effect of verbal message itself
Conclusion: Tone of voice extremely important on how ppl interpret verbal messages.
Evaluation:
- Carried out in artificial conditions
Kendon- Eye Movement
Aim: Eye movement affects flow of conversation
Method: Pairs of particapents asked to get acquainted. Conversations secretly watched.
Results: As one about to speak, they lookd away from other briefly avoiding eye contact. Gave a prolonged look when they about to finish what saying. If prolonged look didn't happen then pause in conversation
Conclusion: Eye movements signal turn taking in conversation
Evaluation: Asking someone to get acquainted and observing them is a very artificial condition
Argyle- Eye Contact
Aim: If interrupting eye contact affects convo
Method: 1/2 conversations one particapent wore sunglasses so other couldn't receive eye contact
Results: When wearing sunglasses- more interruptions and pauses
Conclusion: Eye contact important in ensuring smooth flow of conversation.
Hess- Pupil Dilation
Aim: Effect of pupil dilation on emotion
Method: Particapents shown almost identicle picture of a girl and asked which picture more attractive. One pic= pupil dilated Other pic= Not
Results: Most particapents said girl with dilated pupil looked more attractive, couldn't say why
Conclusion: Pupil dilation has powerful effect on emotion
Evaluation:
Helps to understand why use of eye makeup is important
Sakeim- Facial Expression
Aim: Look at relationship between facial expression and hemisphere of brain
Method: People's face showing diff emotions cut down middle, new pics created with each half face and its mirror image. Particapents asked which ones they liked better
Results: Preffered pic of left, said it looked "warmer"
Conclusion: Left side of face shows more emotion than right
Evaluation: Studies that involve still pics= artificial
McGinley- Postural Echo
Aim: Effect of postural echo when having convo
Method: Confederate of experimenter approached individuals in social setting and had convos with them. 1/2 time echoed posture of person 1/2 time didn't. Experimenter approached individuals and asked what thought about confederate
Results: When used= liked and thought got on well. Not used= Not liked as much convo felt awkward
Conclusion: Postural echo gived unconcious message of friendliness
Evaluation:
Unethical= didn't realise they were being used as particapents
McGinley, Lefevre and McGinley- Open & Closed Post
Aim: Effect of opene and closed posture when having convo
Method: Confederate had convo in social setting. 1/2 time open 1/2 time had closed. Experimenter approached individuals asked what thought of confederate
Results: Open= Friendly, attractive Closed= Unfriendly, less attractive
Conclusion: Posture someone adopts makes difference to how much liked
Evaluation:
Personality differences between people approached may have had confederate more appealing
Lynn and Mynier- Gestures
Aim: Effect of gestures used by waiters and waitresses on tipping behaviour of customers in restaurant
Method: Waiters and waitresses instructed to stand upright or squat near customer. (Squatting makes more eye contact possible)
Results: Squatted= larger tips concieved
Conclusion: When squatting down near a seated customer will have effect on tipping behaviour
Evaluations:
Other effects on why tip given, eg. size of the bill
Fisher, Rytting and Heslin- Touch
Aim: Effect of touch on people's attitudes
Method: Female students handed book my librarian. 1/2 time librarian touched their hand briefly, other 1/2 didn't
Results: Students questioned. Touched= more positive attitude towards librarian. Students were not aware that they were being touched
Conclusion: Touch has an unconcious and positive effect on attitudes.
Evaluations:
All students were female, cannont be generalised to males
Argyle and Dean- Sex differences (Personal Space)
Aim: Sex differences affect personal space
Method: Particapents asked to sit and have convo with another person who was confederate. Sometimes condeferate was opposite sex or same sex. Sat at different distances from particapent and continiually looked into other person's eye
Results: Opposite sex= Broke eye contact at greater distance than when the same sex. Argyle and Dean thought this was the point where personal space was being invaded
Conclusion: Prefer to have greater amount of personal space between ourselves and oppiste sex when having convo
Willis- Age (Personal Space)
Aim: If age has effect on personal space
Method: Willis obseved almost 800 individuals in different social situations
Results: Tend to stand closer to people their own age. Stand further away from people much older or younger
Conclusion: Age difference affects how close people will stand to one another
Williams- Personality (Personal Space)
Aim: If personality has effect on personal space
Method: College students given personality test to see if extrovert or introvert. Then sent to an offic one by one to receive college grads from tutor. Researchers noted where chose to sit in office.
Results: Introverts sat further away from tutors than extroverts
Conclusion: Whether someone is introvert or extrovert will affect their use of personal space
Sommer- Cultural Differences (Personal Space)
Aim: If cultural differences in use of personal space
Method: Observed group of white Ebglish people and Arab people in convo
Results: English comfortable distances- 1-1.5m. Arab comfortable distances much less than that
Conclusion: Use of personal space in normal convo varies with culture
Zahn- Status (Personal Space)
Aim: See if status has effect on personal space
Method: Observed people of equal status approaching eachother to have convo. Then observed people of unequal status approaching
Results: People of lower status didn't approach people of higher status with same degree of closeness as those of equal status
Conclusion: Use of personal space varies with differences in status when approaching other people
Related discussions on The Student Room
- non verbal communication and eye contact »
- Nursing Proficiency Help »
- admission entry test, verbal, non verbal reasoning, yellis test »
- issue w/ international student flatmates »
- Verbs and Verbal Phrases »
- HSC LEVLE 3 UNIT 5 LEARNING AIM B/C D2 help »
- The latymer school sixth form »
- UAL interview »
- Need advice (I think i might have autism) »
- Westminster 16+ Entry 2024 »
Comments
No comments have yet been made