NNURDS of approaches

Only nuture is acknowlaged but acknowlage fear of loud noises and falling but still determinatistic and nomothetic as it say everyone learns in the same way 

Useful therapy (systematic desensitistion) and learning in school good for society 

Building blocks of CBT 

Research is generally done in lab setting so scientific 

Scientfic backing and clear assumptions and supporting research and real world applications 

Only nature no nuture. Too reductionist and deterministic Concordance rates in things like sz is not 100% for biology so needs both 

Nomothetic as all treatments do not work for eeryone but allows us to treat evryne in a generalised day 

Drug therapies and psychosurgery makes it useful but both have side effects 75% of mental health therapis include drugs but the others could also have talking therapies 

Not al drugs have been made for mental health 

Uses PET scans etc so scinetific so can not manipulate results but could report in certain way to make it bias 

Respected feild and emprical backing but diathesis stress model backed by Raine, long established 

Acknowlages both nature and nurture e.g. Atkinson and Shiffrin MSM (input from enviroment but processed by internal structures) supported by mostly case studies and reasearch e.g. HM and  Loftus and Plamer 

Acknowlages individual differences e.g. different schemas 
But assumes memory store is fixed 

Less wrongful convictions e.g. inncence project 

CBT is effective so useful but blame is fully in patient 

Holistic e.g. looks at cognitive triad and nature + nurture 

Free will as CBT moves at own pace and actively changing thinking process 
Say people are effected by leading questions (assumed) 

Scientific as it has research backing and in lab setting but unnatural findings lead to changes in society 

Applied to real life issues and acknowlages both sides 

Looks more at nurture but some evidence of nature 
Mindfullness based on enviromental experiences 

idiographic so can not be generalised but acknowlages individula differences 

Mindfullness has not got enough research to say if it is usefull 
But useful for some groups e.g. students 

Free will acknowlaged

Not enough research as it is a novel area and  Myer + Diener was lit reveiw 

Needs more research before it becomes credible 

Nature Id and Ego and psychosexual stages of development which are nurtured into you 

Idiogaphic as dream analysis is up to the person what they think the therapist simply provides potential answers 

dream anyanysis can not be give for depression etc. 

Sexist and no longer relavant in todays society 

Places all blame on mother so reductionist and determinstic 

Non-scientific methods (all unconscious) 

Outdated so no longer relavant in todays society