Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA)
- Created by: amy_grace6
- Created on: 23-03-21 10:41
When to use MANOVA
ANOVA:
- Used to test for group differences in an IV(s) on 1 DV
MANOVA:
- Used to test for group differences in an IV(s) on multiple DVs
What is MANOVA?
- Effectively an ANOVA looking for group differences on a single composite DV.
- Composite DV: a new composite DV is created which is weighted combination of the individual DVs
The Composite DV
- Made up from a weighted combination of the old DVs
- If MANOVA is performed with 3 DVs:
- new DV = b1 x DV1 + b2 x DV2 + b3 x DV3 + a
- Weights are chosen (through complex procedures) that produce the biggest group differences on the new DV.
- When yoy have multiple IVs, a different 'new' DV is used for each effect - as different weights may be required for each IV to maximise the group differences.
Advantages of MANOVA
- Good protection against inflation of type I error rate
- carrying out lots of seperate ANOVAs could lead to spurious significances (multiple comparisons)
- Can reveal effects not detected by ANOVA
- rarely occurs
Disadvantages of MANOVA
- More complex
- Additonal assumptions
- Outcome can be difficult to interpret
- Can be less powerful than ANOVA under certain circumstances
- i.e., less sensitive to detecting a real effect
Choice of Dependant Variables
- Moderately correlated DVs work best
- indicvates that the concept under study (e.g. well-being) consists of different (but related) dimensions
- MANOVA poor choice when very low or high correlations
- high correlations suggest that multiple dimesions do not exist, but probably measuiring the same thing several times
- in this case choose one DV and perform ANOVA
- very low correlations - MANOVA less powerful
Data Screening I
Outliers
- Check using boxplots or histograms
- Each DV mjust be checked for outliers in every cell
- SPSS 'Split File' function is a convienent way of splitting the entire sample into seperate groups
Data Screening II
Multivariate Normality:
- Individual IVs should be normally distrubuted
- Composite Dvs should also be normally distributed
- Checking second assumption is unrealistic, checking first is normally sufficient
- If you have equal cell sizes and 15 or more ppts. in each group MANOVA is relatively robust to violations of multivariate normality
Data Screening III
Homogeneity of Variance - Box's M test
- Tests if variances and covariances of DVs are the same in each cell
- If Box's M signficant (p<o.o5) then they are significantly different & assumption is violated
- If Box's M non-significant then variances - covariances are the same & assumption is met
- However, MANOVA is robust to violations of this assumption if cell sizes are equal
TIP: where possible, planning your research so you have equal(ish) cell sizes and reasonable sample size - avoids potential problems with assumptions
Other Assumptions
- Other assumptions may be required if equivalent ANOVA requires them
- Repeated Measures MANOVA requires sphericity assumption to be met
- MANCOVA requires a linear relationship between the covariate and each DV.
MANOVA Procedure I
1) Look at Multivariate Tests table for MANOVA results
- SPSS gives you 4 different statistics
- Pillai's Trace, Wilk's Lambada, Hotelling's Trace & Roy's largest root
- Each gives an F-value & p-value
- Use Wilk's Lambada; although others often give similar results
MANOVA Procedure II
Only is MANOVA is signficant then:
2) Do 'post-hoc' analyses using ANOVA on each individual DV to see where the IV(s) have had an effect. Use significance correction (Bonferroni) for multiple tests
MANOVA - Where to find values in SPSS I
- Table of correlations shows if correlations are not very high or very low to suggest whether it is worth perfoming MANOVA.
- Table of means indicates the mean score for the 2 groups on each DV
- Box's M is non-signifcant - indicates homogeneity of variance-covariance assumption sucessfully met
-
MANOVA - Where to find values in SPSS II
- Multivariate Tests indicates the MANOVA results, use Wilk's Lambada to see if there is a significant effect
- If MANOVA results are signficant, do seperate analysis on ANOVAs on each DV to see where differences are
- ANOVA requires assumption of homegeneity of variance to be met- variance for each group should be equal
- Apply a Bonferreroni correction for the three tests
Write-Up
"The __________ data were analysed using MANOVA with IV(s) entered as the IVs, and DVs entered as the DVs. The analysis revealed a significant/non-signficant multivariate effect of IV (Wilk's Lambada = ?(value on output), F(?,?) = ?(F value), p=?). ANOVA performed on each DV seperately showed that even after applying a Bonferroni correction for the three tests of ?(sig. value) a significant/non-signficant effect on IV was observed (F(df1,df2)= ? (F value), p=?), with _____ (mean) report significantly/non-signficantly higher/lower IV than _____ (mean). There were no significant group differences on either DV (F(df1,df2) =? (Fvalue), p=?), or DV(F(df1,df2)=?(Fvalue), p=?)"
Related discussions on The Student Room
- MA Big Data at KCL vs MSc Social Research Methods LSE »
- Economics at Oxford: is there enough maths? »
- SPSS Assignment »
- Central Limit Theorem: How do you calculate the test statistic? »
- Profile Evaluation for MSc. Economics and MSc. Development Economics »
- Which laptop for Kings? »
- Cambridge MPhil Economics/Economic Research 2024 »
- Standard deviation larger than the mean. »
- Interviews Research »
- Easy Maths modules at University »
Comments
No comments have yet been made