This was based on the film '12 Angry Men' where a boy was accused of killing his father. The jury discuss and come to the conclusion he's guilty, however, one juror think's he's innocent and manages to change the other juror's minds by providing logical principles.
So, students were given a 4-page booklet outlining the case.
Some students got how many jurors changed their minds and some got the counter-arguments that this sold juror provided.
The found that the students who thought he was innocent were the ones that got the counter-arguments and how many jurors changed their minds (see snowball effect).
Therefore, in order to be successful, minorities have to act on principles!
Comments
No comments have yet been made