Measuring Crime & Offender Profiling. Evaluations of measuring crime and offender profiling. 3.0 / 5 based on 1 rating ? PsychologyCrininological and Forensic PsychologyA2/A-level Created by: Amy SinclairCreated on: 27-01-11 19:08 Official Statistics Evaluation. Only measure reported and recorded crimes. This leaves a dark figure. Self-Report Studies Unreliable answers - exaggeration etc. Biased selection of offences. Biased selection of interviews - e.g. leave out dangerous offenders. Victim Surveys Collects information about fear and attitudes to crime. Some types of crime excluded from surveys e.g. corporate crime. 1 of 2 Offender Profiling Evaluations. Typology Interviews to establish different types - small sample - 36. Found that most offenders are organised - not enough evidence for disorganised for it to be called a type. Lacks scientific evidence - more of an art than a science. Worked for Arthur Shawcross - returned to victims etc. Applied to all sexually motivated crimes. Geographical Based on psychological theory - more science than typology. Useful for all types of crimes. Worked in the case of Peter Sutcliffe. Location of crime not enough on its own - behaviour also needs to be understood. 2 of 2
Comments
No comments have yet been made