Main Research Methods

  • Created by: Holly
  • Created on: 06-11-14 13:13



  • A lot of research in cognitive psychology (CP) happens in labs
  • Scientific and reliable - has great control over variables 


  • This type of research doesn’t tell us much about the world - it has LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY
1 of 8



  • Take place in a natural situation - MORE ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY 


  • Less control over variables
2 of 8



  • Involve making observations of a naturally occurring situation
  • They have HIGH ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY - but they are not massively reliable, as uncontrolled variables can affect the results.


  • Experimenter has little control over the variables & P’s can’t be randomly assigned to conditions.
3 of 8



  • Can now be carried out during a cognitive task. e.g. MRI scans have been used to show the blood flow in different brain areas for different types of memory tasks.
4 of 8



  • Provide support for the cognitive approach
  • Use patients’ behaviour to test a theory


  • Hard to make generalisations 
  • Individual differences between people mean that one subject may respond in a way that is totally different from someone else.

Case study of HM - Milner et al (1957)

5 of 8

Study of HM - Milner et al (1957)


  • HM was a patient with severe and frequently epilepsy.
  • His seizures were based in the hippocampus 
  • In 1953, doctors decided to surgically remove part of that brain round this area.


  • Operation reduced his epilepsy, but lead him to memory loss
  • He could still form STM's, but was unable to form new LTM’s. E.g. he could read something over and over without realising that he had read it before. 
  • Could still talk and show previous skills (procedural memory) 
  • From tests, they found HM’s episodic memory (past events) and semantic memory (knowledge e.g. word meanings) was affected more that his procedural memory
6 of 8



  • The results of non-human studies can be applied to human cognitive abilities. E.g. discovering whether chimpanzees can learn language helps psychologists develop theories about how humans learn language


  • There can be many differences between humans and animals that results can be explained wrongly. E.g. you might conclude that chimpanzees can’t learn a spoken language because they lack the cognitive abilities. But its actually more likely to be because they lack physiological attributes, like a voice box. 

KEY STUDY: Study of language within chimps - Gardener & Gardener (1969)

7 of 8

Study of language within chimps - Gardener & Garde

Method: Washoe (a chimpanzee), was raised like a human child and taught American Sign Language (ASL)

Results: By the end of the 22nd month of the project, Washoe had learnt at least 34 signs Conclusion:

  • The development in language in the chimp appeared to follow the same patterns as language developed in children (both speaking and ASL)
  • Washoe learnt language at similar rates to children of the same age. 
  • She didn’t learn Grammar


  • Ethical considerations - Washoe was taken from the wild and deprived of other chimps for companionship 
  • External Validity - its not possible to accurately generalise results from the study of a chimp to the study of human children.
8 of 8


No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Cognitive Psychology resources »